Opinion

Durrenberger

Court
District Court, S.D. Florida
Filed
Aug 19, 2026
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 44.2%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:25-cv-25316-DPG

ERIC PHILIP DURRENBERGER,

Plaintiff,

v.

FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge Lisette M. Reid (the “Report”). [ECF No. 15]. On December 19, 2025, the Court referred

the case to Judge Reid for a ruling on all pretrial non-dispositive matters and a report and

recommendation on all dispositive matters. [ECF No. 10]. On April 23, 2026, Plaintiff filed an

Amended Complaint. [ECF No. 14]. On June 30, 2026, Judge Reid issued her Report,

recommending that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. [ECF No. 15].

No party filed objections.

A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The objected portions of the report and recommendation

are accorded de novo review if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings that the party

disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see also Fed. R. Civ.

P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific objection is made

are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint Underwriters, L.L.C.,

199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781,

784 (11th Cir. 2006). Given that the parties have not objected to any portion of the Report, the

Court reviewed the Report for clear error. Finding no clear error, the Court agrees with Judge

Reid’s findings and conclusion that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint be dismissed without

prejudice.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

(1) The Report and Recommendation, [ECF No. 15], is ADOPTED in full.

(2) Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, [ECF No. 14], is DISMISSED without

prejudice.

(3) On or before September 4, 2026, Plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint.

(4) The Case is CLOSED pending Plaintiff's filing a Second Amended Complaint.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 19th day of August, 2026.

DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DI CT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.