Opinion

Safo

Court
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Filed
Aug 17, 2026
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 44.1%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

EASTERN DIVISION

JUDE SAFO, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) No. 4:26-cv-00456-ACL

)

OFFICER UNKNOWN GOODMAN, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon review of the file. On July 8, 2026, the Court

ordered self-represented plaintiff Jude Safo to pay the full filing fee for this case, and to sign and

return his Complaint. [Doc. 4]. The Court cautioned plaintiff that his failure to timely comply

with the Order would result in the dismissal of his case without further notice. [Id. at 1, 3].

Plaintiff’s response was due by August 7, 2026.

To date, plaintiff has neither responded to the Court’s Order nor sought additional time to

do so. Local Rule 2.01 authorizes the Clerk of Court to refuse to receive any pleadings “until the

applicable statutory fee is paid, except in cases accompanied by a completed application to

proceed in forma pauperis.” E.D. Mo. L.R. 2.01(B)(1). Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee and

there is no signed operative complaint in this matter. Plaintiff was given meaningful notice of

what was expected, cautioned that his case would be dismissed if he failed to timely comply, and

granted ample time to comply. The Court will therefore dismiss this action, without prejudice,

due to plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s July 8, 2026, Order and his failure to

prosecute his case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626,

630-31 (1962) (stating the authority of a court to dismiss sua sponte for lack of prosecution is

inherent power governed “by the control necessarily vested in courts to manage their own affairs

so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases”); Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801,

803 (8th Cir. 1986) (stating a district court has the power to dismiss an action for the plaintiff's

failure to comply with any court order).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. A

separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith.

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in

good faith.

Dated this 17th day of August, 2026.

STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR. /

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.