Opinion

Opinion

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 44.1%

The opinion

1 Francesco Benavides, CSBN 258924

Law Offices of Francesco Benavides

2 1990 N. California Blvd. 8th Floor

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

3

Tel: (925) 222-7071

4 Email: francesco@benavidesdisabilitylaw.com

5

Attorney for Plaintiff

6 KEISHA BROWN

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION

11

KEISHA BROWN, Case No. 2:25-cv-01422-JDP

12

13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND

PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND

14 v. EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE

15 EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT;

FRANK BISIGNANO, [PROPOSED] ORDER

16 Commissioner of Social Security,

17

Defendant.

18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their

19

undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded

20

attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $9,600.00, under the Equal Access to

21

Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This

22

amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by

23

counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d),

24

25 1920.

26 The parties stipulate that the position of the United States was not substantially

27 justified in this case, and therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees pursuant to

1 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will

2 consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to

3 Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability

4 to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset

5

allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After

6

the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are

7

subject to any offset.

8

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury

9

determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause

10

the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Plaintiff’s counsel,

11

Francesco Benavides, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff.

12

Payments may be made by electronic funds transfer (EFT) or by check.

13

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for

14

EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of

15

Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall

16

constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or

17

Francesco Benavides, including the Law Offices of Francesco Benavides, may have

18

relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

19

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Francesco Benavides to seek

20

Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings

21

clause provisions of the EAJA.

22

Respectfully submitted,

23

24 Dated: July 10, 2026 Law Offices of Francesco Benavides

25 By: /s/ Francesco Benavides

26 FRANCESCO P. BENAVIDES

Attorney for Plaintiff

27

1 Dated: July 10, 2026 ERIC GRANT

United States Attorney

2 MATHEW W. PILE

Head of Program Litigation 1

3

Social Security Administration

4

By: /s/ Margaret Branick-Abilla*

5

MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA

6 Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

7

(*Permission to use electronic signature

8 obtained via email on July 10, 2026).

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

1 {PROPOSED} ORDER

2 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access

to Justice Act Fees and Expenses, IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the

5 || amount of $9,600.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs under 28 U.S.C.

6 || § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation.

7

8

9 IT IS SO ORDERED.

10 ( —

Dated: _ July 14, 2026 q——_—

11 We D. PETERSON

12 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4-

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.