Opinion

Weisner

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Jun 2, 2026
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 41.7%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ee eee ee eee een meen □□□ noone

SHOLEM WEISNER and SHMUEL NEMANOV, :

Plaintiffand ; ORDER DENYING MOTION

Involuntary Plaintiff, . fOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

-against- : WITHOUT PREJUDICE

: 20 Civ, 2862 (AKH)

: 23 Civ, 8186 (AKH)

GOOGLE LLC.

Defendant. ©

veneer □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ K

ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.I.:

Following entry of judgment and denial of Sholem Weisner’s post-trial motions,

Google LLC seeks an award of attorney’s fees under Section 285 of the Patent Act. Whether to award

attorney’s fees under Section 285 is a matter of my “equitable discretion” wherein I consider “the

totality of the circumstances,” including “frivolousness, motivation, objective unreasonableness (both

in the factual and legal components of the case) and the need in particular circumstances to advance

considerations of compensation and deterrence,” Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness,

Inc., 572 U.S. 545, 554 n.6 (2014).

However, Weisner timely sought appeal of the final judgment and that appeal remains

pending in the Federal Circuit. In my discretion, I may deny a motion for attorney’s fees while appeal

is pending without prejudice and direct a new filing after the appeal has been resolved. Fed. R. Civ.

P, 54(d)(2) Advisory Committee Notes (1993); accord Tancredi v, Metro. Life Ins. Co., 378 F.3d 220,

225-26 (2d Cir, 2004), “Since the pending [attorneys’ fees] motion turns on which party is the

‘prevailing party’ for purposes of entitlement to fees and costs, it is clear that the resolution of

[Plaintiff's] pending appeal on the merits could potentially impact the Court’s determination of the

fee motion.” Mail Am. Commce’ns, Inc. v. World Healing Ctr. Church, Inc., 2021 WL 3159764, at *2

(S.D.N.Y, June 18, 2021).

Therefore, I deny the motion without prejudice, and direct Google to refile the motion, .

as necessary, after the appeal has been resolved. The Clerk of Court shall terminate ECF Nos. 520

and 522.

SO ORDERED. .

Dated: June Z-2026 LL. EE

New York, New York CALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.