Opinion

Opinion

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Jan 7, 2026
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 41.5%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------------------- X

:

CUMULUS MEDIA NEW HOLDINGS INC., :

:

Plaintiff, :

: 25-CV-08581 (JAV)

-v- :

: ORDER GRANTING

THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US) LLC, : MOTION TO SEAL

:

Defendant. :

:

---------------------------------------------------------------------- X

JEANNETTE A. VARGAS, United States District Judge:

The Court has before it motions to seal filed both by Defendant The Nielsen Company (US)

LLC (“Nielsen”) and Plaintiff Cumulus Media New Holdings Inc. (“Cumulus”). See ECF Nos.

119, 120, 121, and 126.

The motions at ECF Nos. 120, 121, and 126 seek to seal portions of the parties’ proposed

findings of fact and conclusions of law following a hearing on Cumulus’s motion for a preliminary

injunction. The Court finds that the parties’ proposals are consistent with its procedure outlined at

the December 11, 2025, evidentiary hearing (Dec. 11, 2025 Hrg. Tr. 333:9–334:9) and are

GRANTED, as both parties have made a sufficient showing that their proposed redactions conceal

“confidential business information” that is material to the parties’ competitive position in the market

and could potentially inflict “significant competitive disadvantage” on the parties. Standard Inv.

Chartered, Inc. v. Fin. Indus. Regul. Auth., Ind., 347 F. App’x 615, 617 (2d Cir. 2009) (internal

quotation marks omitted). The Court thus finds that, in this instance, the “interest in protecting

confidential business information outweighs the qualified First Amendment presumption of public

access.” Id. (internal citations and quotation marks omitted); Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga,

435 F.3d 110, 124 (2d Cir. 2006).

Cumulus’s letter motion at ECF No. 119 addresses redactions to the Court’s Opinion on

Cumulus’s preliminary injunction motion. The Court has resolved this matter through its Order at

ECF No. 134.

The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF Nos. 119, 120, 121, and 126.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 7, 2026 LOAAL | Ag

New York, New York AEANNETTE A. VARGAS

/ United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.