Opinion

Opinion

Court
District Court, N.D. California
Filed
May 8, 2026
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

STRICT ¢,

65. rie “OURS

MAY 08 2026 }} UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

1p MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

SD.

IN RE: GOOGLE DIGITAL ADVERTISING

ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDE No. 3010

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —18)

On August 10, 2021, the Panel transferred 18 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the

Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1407. See 555 F.Supp.3d 1372 (I.P.M.L, 2021). Since that time, 22 additional action(s) have been transferred

to the Southern District of New York. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to

the Honorable P, Kevin Castel.

It appears that the action(s} on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the

actions previously transferred to the Southern District of New York and assigned to Judge Castel.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation,

the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Southern District of New

York for the reasons stated in the order of August 10, 2021, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to

the Honorable P, Kevin Castel.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District

Court for the Southern District of New York. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days

from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day

period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as na objection Is FOR THE PANEL:

pending at this tIme, tha

stay is lifted,

May 08, 2026 Eee

CLERK'S OFFICE

wu taetenet on, Josh R. Bullock

Acting Clerk of the Panel

Tammi M. Heliwig

_Slerk of Court

Deputy Clerk

IN RE: GOOGLE DIGITAL ADVERTISING

ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL No. 3010

SCHEDULE CTO-18 —- TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 5 26-03143 MH Sub I, LLC et al v. Google LLC

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.