Opinion

Redo v. Sylvestri

  • 690 So. 2d 731
  • 1997 WL 149390
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Apr 2, 1997
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 67.5%

The opinion

690 So.2d 731 (1997)

Paula REDO, Appellant,

v.

Gary SYLVESTRI and C.S. Holding, Appellees.

No. 96-2110.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 2, 1997.

Jeffrey J. Walker of Jeffrey J. Walker, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

*732 George P. Roberts, Jr. of Roberts & Reynolds, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Paula Redo's third amended complaint contains a claim for civil damages against appellee police officers under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , alleging that the officers used excessive force in arresting her. See Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 394 , 109 S.Ct. 1865, 1871 , 104 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989). The trial court granted the officers' motion for summary judgment on the grounds of qualified immunity. The facts surrounding the arrest are in dispute; the version most favorable to Redo is that she did not resist and that she was beaten while lying on her stomach and being restrained by handcuffs and shackles.

Where the facts upon which the determination of qualified immunity hinges are in dispute, then those facts require a determination by a finder of fact. Brescher v. Pirez, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D210 , ___ So.2d ___ [ 1997 WL 11857 ] (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 15, 1997). Beating a restrained suspect who is not resisting is obviously unlawful and violative of a suspect's constitutional rights. E.g., Butler v. City of Norman, 992 F.2d 1053 (10th Cir.1993)(fact issues precluded officers' summary judgment on ground of qualified immunity where plaintiff's deposition stated that officers beat him with flashlight when his hands were handcuffed behind his back). If Redo proves her allegations, then the officers are not entitled to the defense of qualified immunity, since their conduct violated clearly established constitutional law. See Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 , 102 S.Ct. 2727, 2738 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982); City of Hialeah v. Fernandez, 661 So.2d 335, 339 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

The summary final judgment in favor of appellees is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

FARMER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.