Opinion

Lang

Court
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Filed
Apr 15, 2026
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 41.2%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

James H. Lang, :

: Case No. 1:25-cv-511

Plaintiff, :

: Judge Susan J. Dlott

v. :

: Order Adopting Report and

Brown County Detention Center, : Recommendation.

:

Defendant. :

This matter is before the Court on Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate

Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. (Doc. 13.) Plaintiff James H. Lang has filed a pro se Complaint

asserting claims under 42 U.S.C.§ 1983 for alleged violations of his First, Sixth, Eighth, and

Fourteenth Amendments against Brown County Detention Center, the jail where he was held as a

pretrial detainee. (Doc. 1-1.) Magistrate Judge Silvain, on his own accord, screened the

Complaint as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and determined that Lang’s allegations are

insufficient to state a claim for relief. (Doc. 13 at PageID 52–54.) He recommended dismissing

the Complaint but granting Lang leave to file an amended complaint. (Id. at PageID 53–54.)

Lang did not file an objection to the Report and Recommendation. A district court need

not independently review a report and recommendation to which no objection is made. See

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985). Nonetheless, the Court has reviewed the Report and

Recommendation here for clear error and finds that the Magistrate Judge was correct. The

Brown County Detention Center is not a legal entity capable of being sued, and Lang’s

allegations are insufficient to state a claim for relief against Brown County itself.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) is ADOPTED, and the

Complaint (Doc. 1-1) is DISMISSED. But the Court gives Lang permission to file an amended

complaint not exceeding twenty (20) pages in length on or before May 11, 2026 if he wants to

try to remedy the deficiencies in the Complaint. Lang should set forth in clear, short, and

concise terms the names of each defendant, the specific claims for relief attributable to each

defendant, and the factual allegations supporting each such claim. As required by S.D. Ohio

Local Rule 5.1, the amended complaint should be legible and double-spaced. Further, pursuant

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2), the factual allegations and claims must arise out of

the same transaction or occurrence. If Lang wishes to seek relief based on unrelated claims he

must do so in separate actions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

S/Susan J. Dlott

Susan J. Dlott

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.