Opinion

Taylor

Court
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Filed
Jul 1, 2026
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 41.2%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

EASTERN DIVISION

ENRICO TAYLOR, )

Plaintiff,

Vv. )

) No. 4:26-cv-00681-SEP

NIKE, INC., et al., )

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on review of the file. On May 29, 2026, the Court ordered

Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed in District Court

Without Prepaying Fees or Costs no later than June 19, 2026. Doc. [6]. Plaintiff was warned

that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the matter without prejudice. Id. Nearly two

weeks after the deadline, Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor filed a new Application.

The Court will therefore dismiss this action due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court’s

Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Dudley v. Miles, 597 F. App’x 392 (8th Cir. 2015) (per curiam)

(affirming dismissal without prejudice where self-represented plaintiff failed to file an amended

complaint despite being cautioned that dismissal could result from failure to do so); Brown v.

Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986) (a district court has the power to dismiss an action for the

plaintiff's failure to comply with any court order).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A

separate Order of Dismissal will issue herewith.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good

faith.

Dated this Ist day of July, 2026.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.