Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 940 So. 2d 498
  • 2006 WL 2956284
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Oct 18, 2006
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 65.6%

The opinion

940 So.2d 498 (2006)

Isac Quincy BROWN, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D06-3233.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 18, 2006.

Isac Quincy Brown, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Brown's rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, wherein he seeks retroactive application of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 , 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). As we did in Thomas v. State, 914 So.2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), we certify conflict with Isaac v. State, 911 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), to the extent that the court applied Blakely retroactively.

GUNTHER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.