Opinion

Rodriguez

Court
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 40.9%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

ABRAHAM SALOMON RODRIGUEZ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00535 SEC P

#42887-279

VERSUS JUDGE JAMES D. CAIN, JR.

FELIPE MARTINEZ JR MAGISTRATE JUDGE LEBLANC

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Pro se Petitioner Abraham Salomon Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”) filed a Petition for

Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. At the time of filing, Rodriguez was

imprisoned at the Federal Correctional Institution in Oakdale, Louisiana. He challenged

the computation of his sentence and sought a speedier release from custody. According to

the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”), Rodriguez was released on March 12, 2025.1

Article III of the Constitution limits the judicial power of the United States to the

resolution of “Cases” and “Controversies.” Hein v. Freedom From Religion Found., Inc.,

551 U.S. 587, 597 (2007) (quoting DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno, 547 U.S. 332, 342

(2006) (internal quotations and citations omitted)). A case becomes moot “when the issues

presented are no longer ‘live’ or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the

outcome.” United States Parole Comm'n v. Geraghty, 445 U.S. 388, 396 (1980) (quoting

Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486, 496 (1969)).

1 https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/

The case-or-controversy requirement “subsists through all stages of federal judicial

proceedings, trial and appellate.” Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998) (citations

omitted). The parties must continue to have a “personal stake in the outcome” of the

lawsuit. Jd. Therefore, throughout the litigation, the petitioner “must have suffered, or be

threatened with, an actual injury traceable to the defendant and likely to be redressed by a

favorable judicial decision.” Jd.

Because Rodriguez was released from BOP custody, his § 2241 claim is moot. The

Court can no longer grant the relief requested. If a controversy is moot, the court lacks

subject matter jurisdiction. Carr v. Saucier, 582 F.2d 14, 16 (Sth Cir. 1978) (citing North

Carolina v. Rice, 404 U.S. 244, 246 (1971); Locke v. Board of Public Instruction, 499 F.2d

359, 363-364 (Sth Cir. 1974)).

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the

Petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers this 29th day of April, 2026.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.