The opinion
VEG 1.214 □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ UCUTTIOIN SU HEU IVI LO 60 AYO LOO
CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP
~~ ——————— eo
AMERICAS: { One Liberty Plaza EUROPE & MIDDLE EAST
SDNY New York, NY 10006-1470 ABU DHABI
ree <iIMENT T: 41212 225 2000 □□□□
¥ F: +1 212 225 3999 COLOGNE
SILICOBVALLEY > cy :
WASHINGTON, □□□ RONICALLY FILE ae clearygottlieb.com FRANKEURT
asa □□□□□□
BAER FE i ) = 5° 2 MILAN
FILED: 4 7 D: +1 212 225 2085 =e
SEOUL ee rzutshi@cgsh.com ROME
BY ECF ee
Honorable Lewis A. Kaplan (Ff
United States District Judge SO ORD) FRED
Southern District of New York
Daniel Patrick Moynihan
United States Courthouse
500 Pearl Street LEWIS A. KAPLAN, USD
Court Room 21B / ‘B (26
New York, New York 10007-1312
Re: Edmar Financial Company, LLC et al v. Currenex, Inc. et al, Case No. 21-
cv-06598 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y.), Defendant Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC’s
Motion to Seal Exhibits Cited in Plaintiffs’ Class Certification Papers
Dear Judge Kaplan:
On behalf of Defendant Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC (“Goldman”), and pursuant to the
Stipulation and Order of Confidentiality so-ordered in this action on October 18, 2023 (ECF No.
113) and the Joint Stipulation and Order Regarding Class Certification Sealing and Page Limits
(ECF No. 387), we respectfully request that seven documents attached as exhibits to Plaintiffs’
motion for class certification (ECF Nos. 389-91) (the “Motion”), and portions of the Motion
reflecting information from those documents, remain under seal.
Specifically, Goldman requests that the following remain under seal:
e Exhibit 17 to the Brockett Declaration (ECF 391-17 (Schonberg Transcript));
e Exhibit 18 to the Brockett Declaration (ECF 391-18 (GS-EDMAR-00920851));
e Exhibit 19 to the Brockett Declaration (ECF 391-19 (GS-EDMAR-00002650));
e Exhibit 28 to the Brocket Declaration (ECF 391-28 (GS-EDMAR-00336920));
e Exhibit 45 to the Brockett Declaration (ECF 391-45 (GS-EDMAR-00001574));
e Exhibit 46 to the Brockett Declaration (ECF 391-46 (GS-EDMAR-00827316));
e Exhibit 47 to the Brockett Declaration (ECF 391-47 (GS-EDMAR-00368325)).
It is clear from the face of each document that it contains commercially sensitive and/or
proprietary information, including without limitation regarding trading strategies and information
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP or an affiliated entity has an office in each of the locations listed above.
WVdot 1.421 °°UV LAINT TIVE MULUTIHICIN TUE Puiu L2iULIL9 Faye 2VuUiu
Hon. Lewis A. Kaplan, p. 2
about the fees that Goldman paid for use of the Currenex platform. Specifically, Exhibits 18 and
19 include pricing information and Exhibits 28, 45, 46 and 47 include information regarding
Goldman’s trading and other business strategies. Exhibit 17 contains excerpts from a deposition
transcript which reflect sensitive financial and proprietary information about Goldman’s trading
strategies on different FX platforms and the commission rates that Goldman paid for use of the
Currenex platform. As a result, each document was appropriately designated as “Highly
Confidential” pursuant to the Court’s Protective Order and should be redacted because its
disclosure could cause competitive harm to Goldman. Courts have recognized that documents
that reflect “internal pricing strategies and competitive pricing data [are] sufficiently sensitive to
warrant redaction” and routinely permit parties to seal documents like the ones at issue here. Jn
re Digital Music Antitrust Litig., 321 F.R.D. 64, 82 n.1 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); see also In re B&C KB
Holding GmbH, 2023 WL 2021299, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2023) (courts “routinely permit
parties to seal or redact commercially sensitive information in order to protect confidential
business and financial information”).
For the same reasons articulated above, the Court has previously granted sealing requests
with respect to Exhibit 18 (See ECF Nos. 170, 175, and 232), Exhibit 45 (See ECF Nos. 257,
273, and 344), and portions of the same transcript as Exhibit 17 (See ECF Nos. 295, 322, and
345).
For the reasons set forth above, the Court should order that the exhibits at issue and
references to them in Plaintiffs’ Motion remain sealed.
WVdosl 1.44 □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ WOULCUTTCIN SUE FIMO LIVI = Faye oO US
Hon. Lewis A. Kaplan, p. 3
Dated: December 2, 2025
New York, New York
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Rishi N. Zutshi
Carmine D. Boccuzzi, Jr.
(cboccuzzi@cgsh.com)
Rishi N. Zutshi
(rzutshi@cgsh.com)
CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP
One Liberty Plaza
New York, New York 10006
T: 212-225-2000
F: 212-225-3999
Attorneys for Defendant Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC
cc: Counsel of Record