Opinion

Delia & Wilson, Inc. v. Wilson

  • 448 So. 2d 621
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Apr 18, 1984
Status
Published
On the bench
Norris
Cited by
16 cases
Authority
More cited than 93.9%

The opinion

448 So.2d 621 (1984)

DELIA & WILSON, INC., and William Delia, Appellants,

v.

Robert L. WILSON and Viola Wilson, Appellees.

No. 83-1854.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 18, 1984.

Jeff M. Brown of Lavalle, Wochna, Rutherford & Brown, Boca Raton, for appellants.

*622 Edward G. Stephany of Marko, Stephany & Lyons, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

NORRIS, WILLIAM A., Jr., Associate Judge.

Although the trial court correctly dismissed appellants' amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action, it was improper to dismiss this complaint with prejudice. A dismissal with prejudice should not be ordered without giving the party offering the defective pleading an opportunity to amend unless it is clear that the pleading cannot be amended so as to state a cause of action. Hansen v. Central Adjustment, Bureau, Inc., 348 So.2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). We believe that appellants should be given the opportunity to amend so as to state a cause of action. We reverse the trial court's order dismissing the amended complaint with prejudice; upon remand appellants shall be allowed to file an amended complaint.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.