Opinion

Wallace

Court
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Filed
Apr 2, 2026
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

CARLOS J. WALLACE, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Case No. 1:26-cv-00021-SNLJ

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon review of the file. Petitioner Carlos Wallace

commenced this action with a handwritten filing, construed as seeking relief under 28

U.S.C. § 2255. [Doc. 1]. However, the filing was defective as a § 2255 motion because

it was not drafted on a Court-provided form. As such, on February 13, 2026, the Court

directed the Clerk to send Petitioner the Court form for §2255 motions and ordered

Petitioner to file an amended motion on the Court form within thirty (30) days. [Doc. 2].

The Court cautioned Petitioner that his failure to timely comply with the Court’s Order

would result in the dismissal of his case. [Id.] Petitioner’s response was due by March

16, 2026.

To date, Petitioner has neither responded to the Court’s order, nor sought

additional time to do so. Petitioner was given meaningful notice of what was expected,

he was cautioned that his case would be dismissed if he failed to timely comply, and he

was given ample time to comply. The Court will therefore dismiss this action, without

prejudice, due to Petitioner’s failure to comply with the Court’s February 13, 2026 Order

and his failure to prosecute his case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Link v. Wabash

R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962) (the authority of a court to dismiss sua sponte for

lack of prosecution is inherent power governed “by the control necessarily vested in

courts to manage their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious

disposition of cases”); Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986) (a district court

has the power to dismiss an action for the plaintiffs failure to comply with any court

order).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. A

separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith.

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be

taken in good faith.

Dated this 2nd day of April, 2026.

STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR.“

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.