Opinion

ELSBERRY, DEXTER M. v. FEDEX

  • 2026 TN WC 40
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Apr 17, 2026
Status
Published
On the bench
Marion
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Apr 17, 2026

10:19 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MEMPHIS

DEXTER M. ELSBERRY, Docket No. 2025-80-7100

Employee,

v.

FEDEX, State File No. 57381-2025

Employer,

and

INDEMNITY INS. CO. OF N. AM., Judge Shaterra R. Marion

Carrier.

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

The Court held an expedited hearing on April 9, 2026. Mr. Elsberry sought

medical and temporary disability benefits. FedEx contended that Mr. Elsberry

already received all benefits due. For the reasons below, the Court holds that Mr.

Elsberry is not likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits in showing his entitlement

to benefits.

Claim History

Mr. Elsberry injured his back on August 7, 2025, while working at FedEx. He

chose Dr. James Escue from a panel. Dr. Escue diagnosed Mr. Elsberry with a

lumbar strain, ordered physical therapy, and returned him to work with restrictions.

At his final visit, Dr. Escue wrote that some of Mr. Elsberry’s pain complaints “do

not match with his diagnosis.”

A month later, Mr. Elsberry went to the hospital, where a doctor ordered a CT

scan. The scan showed mild degenerative disc disease and a disc bulge, and the

doctor recommended Mr. Elsberry contact Dr. Escue.

Six weeks later, Mr. Elsberry went to another hospital with “worsening back

pain.” An MRI showed a disc bulge but no acute abnormality. Mr. Elsberry wanted

back surgery, but the doctor found no “emergent indication” that would require

1

surgery.

After these encounters, FedEx offered another panel, and Mr. Elsberry chose

Dr. John Brophy. He told Dr. Brophy he had pain in his back and buttocks that

extended into his legs. Dr. Brophy offered a steroid injection or continued

observation with activity modification and medication.

Mr. Elsberry asked for the injection. He went to have the injection with a

different doctor in the clinic. Mr. Elsberry refused the injection and demanded to see

Dr. Brophy because he had additional questions and developed intermittent

numbness in both legs since the last visit.

Dr. Brophy spoke with Mr. Elsberry and wrote that “based on his current

complaints, which have increased in severity,” he did not think Mr. Elsberry’s lower-

extremity symptoms resulted from his work accident and could not be explained by

the disc abnormality shown on the MRI. He recommended that Mr. Elsberry manage

his back pain “with a low-impact home endurance exercise program.”

Dr. Brophy told Mr. Elsberry to see his primary care physician and released

him to work without restrictions effective February 9, 2026. Dr. Brophy confirmed

in his final medical report that he placed Mr. Elsberry at maximum medical

improvement with a 0% rating.

Mr. Elsberry argued that he needs additional treatment. He also said that

because Dr. Brophy recommended injections, he should not have been placed at

maximum medical improvement.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Elsberry must prove he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits on

his request for benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2025); McCord v.

Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9

(Mar. 27, 2015).

To recover medical benefits, Mr. Elsberry must show a physician found to a

reasonable degree of medical certainty that his work injury contributed more than

50% in causing his current need for medical treatment, considering all causes. Id. §

50-6-102(12).

2

Mr. Elsberry did not meet this requirement, as Dr. Brophy ultimately

determined his work accident did not cause his current symptoms. Although Dr.

Brophy recommended a steroid injection, he changed his opinion on the medical

necessity of the injection when Mr. Elsberry relayed new symptoms that could not

be explained by his MRI results. So, Mr. Elsberry is unlikely to show at a hearing

on the merits that he is entitled to additional medical treatment.

The Court also denies Mr. Elsberry’s request for additional temporary

disability benefits. These benefits “are terminated either by the ability to return to

work or attainment of maximum recovery.” Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales,

2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015).

Here, Dr. Brophy stated that Mr. Elsberry reached maximum medical

improvement, and Mr. Elsberry gave no contrary proof. Therefore, his attainment of

maximum medical improvement ended his right to temporary disability benefits. Mr.

Elsberry is unlikely to prevail at a hearing on the merits on this request as well.

The Court sets a status conference for June 16, 2024, at 1:45 p.m. Central

Time. The parties must call (866) 943-0014 to participate. Failure to call might result

in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

IT IS ORDERED.

ENTERED April 17, 2026.

____________________________________

JUDGE SHATERRA R. MARION

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

3

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Rule 72 Declaration of Mr. Elsberry

2. Car Title Loan Agreement

3. DCS Permanency Plan

4. [For Identification Only] Transcript of Audio Recording between Mr.

Elsberry and Dr. Brophy

5. Emergency Room Visit #2

6. Chronology of Denial

7. Vehicle Repossession Records

8. AT&T Employment Email

9. Text messages between Mr. Elsberry and his coworker

10.Investigative Suspension Records

11.Panels Selecting Drs. Escue and Brophy

12.Medical Records filed by FedEx

13.Final Medical Report of Dr. Brophy

14.Rule 72 Declaration of Danielle Christoph

4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I sent a copy of this Order on April 17, 2026.

Regular

Name Email Service sent to:

Mail

Dexter Elsberry, 7904 Briarwood Cove

Employee X X Bartlett, TN 38002

elsberrydexter@gmail.com

Stephen Miller, smiller@mckuhn.com

Joseph Baker, X jbaker@mckuhn.com

Employer’s Attorneys mdoherty@mckuhn.com

____________________________________

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

5

Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation

Appeals Board. To do so, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.

¾ If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the

order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed

within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed.

¾ If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues

in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of

the date the Compensation Order was filed.

When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney,

if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar

days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office

or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an

Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office)

seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency

within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing

fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. If no court

reporter was present at the hearing, you may request from the Court Clerk the audio

recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If you choose to submit a transcript as part of your

appeal, which the Appeals Board has emphasized is important for a meaningful review of

the case, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript, and you must file it with the

Court Clerk. The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board,

and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. For deadlines related to the filing of

transcripts, statements of the evidence, and briefs on appeal, see the applicable rules on the

Bureau’s website at https://www.tn.gov/wcappealsboard. (Click the “Read Rules” button.)

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the Court Order

becomes enforceable. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(3) (expedited/interlocutory

orders) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7) (compensation orders).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board;ĐŚĞĐŬŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞďŽdžĞƐĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞĚĂƚĞĨŝůĞͲ

ƐƚĂŵƉĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĨŝƌƐƚƉĂŐĞŽĨƚŚĞŽƌĚĞƌ;ƐͿďĞŝŶŐĂƉƉĞĂůĞĚͿ͗

ප Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ ප Motion Order filed on ___________________

ප Compensation Order filed on__________________ ප Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.