The opinion
FILED
Apr 08, 2026
12:19 PM(CT)
TENNESSEE COURT OF
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CLAIMS
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
AT MEMPHIS
YONNY PEREZ HERNANDEZ, Docket No. 2025-80-3406
Employee,
v.
PR MARINE CONSTR., LLC, State File No. 860151-2025
Employer,
and
STONETRUST COM. INS. CO., Judge Shaterra R. Marion
Carrier.
EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER
The Court held an expedited hearing on March 30, 2026. Mr. Hernandez
sought medical benefits for his work injury. PR Marine contended that Mr.
Hernandez did not present medical proof that his work injury caused his current
symptoms and that he should not receive benefits due to his legal status and current
location in Mexico.
For the reasons below, the Court holds that Mr. Hernandez is likely to prevail
at a hearing on the merits in showing he is entitled to medical benefits for his work
injury.
Claim History
On July 17, 2023, Mr. Hernandez was helping carry a large post with four
other people. The post fell on him, and he remembers nothing else until a helicopter
arrived to take him to the hospital. According to him, the pole “split him open.”
Mr. Hernandez suffered injuries to his back and jaw. The hospital wired his
jaw shut and performed surgery on his back, inserting hardware. After being
released, Mr. Hernandez attended four follow-up appointments.
1
Mr. Hernandez testified that after those appointments, he asked PR Marine for
additional treatment but never received it. He moved to Texas about six months after
his injury. On September 3, 2024, he was deported to Mexico for being in the United
States illegally.
Mr. Hernandez testified he never received a panel from PR Marine, either in
the six months he lived in Memphis after his injury, during his time in Texas, or after
he returned to Mexico. PR Marine argued that it reached an agreement with Mr.
Hernandez’s attorney for Mr. Hernandez to see a doctor shortly before his
deportation, but neither party submitted evidence of these agreements.
Mr. Hernandez received checks from PR Marine after his work injury, but
those checks ended when he was deported. He stated he has trouble lifting more than
15 kilograms and cannot sit or stand for long periods without pain. He can feel the
hardware in his back whenever he lie on a hard surface.
PR Marine argued that Mr. Hernandez offered no medical proof to relate his
current symptoms to his work injury. It also argued that treating Mr. Hernandez in
Mexico would be difficult, because it would be hard to find a credentialed physician,
and the physician might be unable to assign restrictions or unwilling to be paid under
the fee schedule.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Mr. Hernandez must prove he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits on
his request for benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2025); McCord v.
Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9
(Mar. 27, 2015).
Generally, an employee must offer an expert medical opinion to prove his
work caused his injuries. Id. § 50-6-102(12). However, that is not the case when the
“[e]mployee’s injury was so ‘obvious’ that no expert medical evidence was required
to prove causation.” Willis v. All Staff, No. M2016-01143-SC-R3-WC, 2017 Tenn.
LEXIS 455, at *13 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel May 22, 2017).
Additionally, the Appeals Board held that an employee may still be entitled
to a panel of physicians even when he offered no medical proof that his work injury
caused her symptoms. McCord, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6 at *17-18.
The Appeals Board relied on the employee’s testimony, the exhibits, and the record
as a whole in determining that the employee was entitled to a panel without medical
proof. Id.; see also Lewis v. Molly Maid, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 19,
at *8-9 (Apr. 20, 2016) (when employee offered unrebutted proof of a work incident,
“while this evidence was insufficient to establish the compensability of her claim by
2
a preponderance of the evidence, it was sufficient to support an order compelling
Employer to provide a panel of physicians.”).
Here, Mr. Hernandez testified that the pole “split him open.” A helicopter
airlifted him to a hospital, where he had his jaw wired shut and back surgery with
the insertion of hardware. PR Marine accepted the claim from the beginning. The
Court holds that although Mr. Hernandez gave no medical proof to show causation,
his injury was obvious, and his testimony and the record support a finding that his
work injury caused the symptoms in his back and jaw.
PR Marine’s contention that it does not owe Mr. Hernandez benefits because
he was not in the country legally and does not currently live in the country is not
supported by Tennessee law. It argued that Mr. Hernandez’s legal status is similar
to that of an incarcerated criminal and pointed to an American Law Review Article
and a Kentucky court, which both stated that incarcerated criminals could not receive
workers’ compensation benefits. Noralyn O. Harlow, Annotation, Workers’
Compensation: Incarceration as Terminating Benefits, 54 A.L.R.4th 241, 253-57
(1987); Whitehead v. Johnson Supply Co., No. 93-CA-0610-WC, 1994 Ky. App.
LEXIS 3 (Ky. Ct. App. 1994).
However, these authorities are merely persuasive, and Mr. Hernandez is not
an incarcerated criminal. A Tennessee “employee” includes every person “whether
lawfully or unlawfully employed.” Id. § 50-6-102(10)(A). Further, employers must
provide a panel of physicians when an injured employee expresses a need for
medical care. Id. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A). Employers must offer a new panel when an
employee changes his community of residence and seeks a new panel. Id. § 50-6-
204(a)(3)(F).
Words in a statute must be given their plain and ordinary meaning in the
context in which they are used. Shore v. Maple Lane Farms, LLC, 411 S.W.3d 405,
420 (Tenn. 2013). Moreover, courts must avoid a construction that unduly restricts
or expands the meaning of the language used, as every word is presumed to have
meaning and purpose. Id. Nothing in the Tennessee workers’ compensation statute
denies medical benefits to someone based on their legal status or residency.
The Court is not persuaded by PR Marine’s argument that it might be difficult
to find a doctor for Mr. Hernandez in Mexico. PR Marine offered no evidence that
it made attempts to find a doctor in Mexico; it solely advanced hypothetical
arguments that it might be difficult to find a credentialed doctor. Further, logistical
difficulties do not relieve an employer of its duty to furnish medical treatment.
The Court therefore holds that Mr. Hernandez is likely to prevail at a hearing
on the merits in showing that his work injury caused his current symptoms and grants
his request for medical benefits.
3
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:
1. Mr. Hernandez’s request for medical benefits is granted. PR Marine shall
provide Mr. Hernandez with medical treatment made reasonably necessary by
his July 17, 2023 injury under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204
2. The Court sets a status conference for June 26, 2026, at 9:45 a.m. Central
Time. The parties must call (866) 943-0014 to participate. Failure to call
might result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.
3. Unless interlocutory appeal of this Expedited Hearing Order is filed,
compliance with this Order must occur by seven business days of entry of this
Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3).
ENTERED April 8, 2026.
____________________________________
JUDGE SHATERRA R. MARION
Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
APPENDIX
Exhibits:
1) Texas District Court Records
2) [For Identification Only] Medical Records
4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of this Order was sent on April 8, 2026.
Regular
Name Email Service sent to:
Stephen King, jking@evanspetree.com
X
Employee’s Attorney
Kyle Cannon, kcannon@gwtclaw.com
X
Employer’s Attorney
____________________________________
PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK
wc.courtclerk@tn.gov
5
Right to Appeal:
If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation
Appeals Board. To do so, you must:
1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the
Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.
¾ If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the
order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed
within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed.
¾ If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues
in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of
the date the Compensation Order was filed.
When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney,
if represented).
2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar
days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office
or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an
Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office)
seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency
within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing
fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.
3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. If no court
reporter was present at the hearing, you may request from the Court Clerk the audio
recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If you choose to submit a transcript as part of your
appeal, which the Appeals Board has emphasized is important for a meaningful review of
the case, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript, and you must file it with the
Court Clerk. The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board,
and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. For deadlines related to the filing of
transcripts, statements of the evidence, and briefs on appeal, see the applicable rules on the
Bureau’s website at https://www.tn.gov/wcappealsboard. (Click the “Read Rules” button.)
4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits
it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.
If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the Court Order
becomes enforceable. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(3) (expedited/interlocutory
orders) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7) (compensation orders).
For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation
www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/
wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667
Docket No.: ________________________
State File No.: ______________________
Date of Injury: _____________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Employee
v.
___________________________________________________________________________
Employer
Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________
[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]
appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the
Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board;ĐŚĞĐŬŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞďŽdžĞƐĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞĚĂƚĞĨŝůĞͲ
ƐƚĂŵƉĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĨŝƌƐƚƉĂŐĞŽĨƚŚĞŽƌĚĞƌ;ƐͿďĞŝŶŐĂƉƉĞĂůĞĚͿ͗
ප Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ ප Motion Order filed on ___________________
ප Compensation Order filed on__________________ ප Other Order filed on_____________________
issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.
Statement of the Issues on Appeal
Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Parties
Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ܆Employer ܆Employee
Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________
Email: __________________________________________________________
Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________
Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *
LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082
Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________
Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ܆Employer ܆Employee
Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________
Email: _________________________________________________________
Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________
Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a
true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described
in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this
case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.
______________________________________________
[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]
LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082