Opinion

Brewer

Court
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Filed
Apr 3, 2026
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHEASTERN DIVISION

STEPHEN DEWAYNE BREWER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No.: 5:25-cv-819-LCB-GMB

)

SHERRI BROWN, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

On December 2, 2025, U.S. Magistrate Judge Gray M. Borden issued a Report

and Recommendation in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) recommending that

the Court dismiss Brewer’s claims without prejudice. (Doc. 11). Brewer has objected

to the report. (Doc. 16).

If a party objects to a portion of a Magistrate Judge’s report or proposed

findings or recommendations, the district court must review de novo those portions

of the report to which the party has specifically objected. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);

FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). Any portions of a Magistrate Judge’s report that are

unchallenged are reviewed for clear error. Haywood v. Green, 695 F.Supp.3d 1315,

1318 (N.D. Ala. Sept. 27, 2023). In its review, the district court may “accept, reject,

or modify, in whole or in part,” the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations.

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Having reviewed de novo the proposed findings and recommendations, the

Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11)

should be ACCEPTED and hereby ADOPTS it as the findings of the Court. The

Court therefore OVERRULES Brewer’s objections (Doc. 16) and DISMISSES his

claims without prejudice.

The Clerk is DIRECTED close this case.

DONE and ORDERED this April 3, 2026.

LILES C. BURKE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.