The opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1056 Doc: 62 Filed: 03/26/2026 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1056
ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY; CONSOL ENERGY, INCORPORATED,
Petitioners,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; ROBERT E. FRAZIER,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (2019-06074-BLA,
2021-0505-BLA)
Argued: March 18, 2026 Decided: March 26, 2026
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition for review denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ARGUED: William Steele Mattingly, JACKSON KELLY PLLC, Lexington, Kentucky,
for Petitioners. Amanda Torres, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Washington, D.C.; Samuel Brown Petsonk, PETSONK PLLC, Oak Hill, West Virginia,
for Respondents. ON BRIEF: Mary L. Bryson, JACKSON KELLY PLLC, Lexington,
Kentucky, for Petitioners. Bren J. Pomponio, Laura Davidson, MOUNTAIN STATE
JUSTICE, Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondent Robert E. Frazier. Seema Nanda,
Solicitor of Labor, Barry H. Joyner, Associate Solicitor, Jennifer Feldman Jones, Deputy
Associate Solicitor, Sean Bajkowski, Office of the Solicitor, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Federal Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1056 Doc: 62 Filed: 03/26/2026 Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Island Creek Coal Company and CONSOL Energy, Inc. (collectively, “Island
Creek”) petition this Court for review of a 2023 decision of the Benefits Review Board (the
“BRB”). That decision affirmed a 2021 award by an Administrative Law Judge (the
“ALJ”) of black lung benefits to 95-year-old retired West Virginia coal miner Robert E.
Frazier, pursuant to the Black Lung Benefits Act of 1977. Mr. Frazier began mining coal
in the Mountain State in 1952, and he retired from that noble occupation in 1988. During
his decades-long coal mining career in southern West Virginia, Mr. Frazier worked solely
for Island Creek. Now, in these administrative proceedings, Island Creek maintains that
Mr. Frazier’s 2017 claim for benefits under the Black Lung Benefits Act is untimely, and
that he is not entitled to benefits because he is not “totally disabled” by pneumoconiosis.
We review an order of the BRB by “undertak[ing] an independent review of the
record” to determine if the ALJ’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence.
See Dehue Coal Co. v. Ballard, 65 F.3d 1189, 1193 (4th Cir. 1995); Island Creek Coal Co.
v. Compton, 211 F.3d 203, 207 (4th Cir. 2000). To that end, “[s]ubstantial evidence is
more than a mere scintilla” — rather, it is characterized as “such relevant evidence as a
reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” See Consolidated
Edison Co. of New York v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938). Furthermore, we review de
novo the legal conclusions of the BRB and the ALJ. See Dehue Coal Co., 65 F.3d at 1193.
In these circumstances, having carefully assessed the relevant administrative record
— along with the appellate submissions of the parties and the argument of the able lawyers
presented in Richmond — we are satisfied to deny Island Creek’s petition for review. Put
2
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1056 Doc: 62 Filed: 03/26/2026 Pg: 3 of 3
simply, we are of opinion that the BRB correctly affirmed the ALJ’s legally-sound and
well-supported award of black lung benefits to Mr. Frazier.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED
3