Opinion

SADDLER, PAUL v. UNITED MECHANICAL AND ELECTRIC, INC.

  • 2026 TN WC 26
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Status
Published
On the bench
Durham
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Mar 20, 2026

01:52 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MURFREESBORO

PAUL SADDLER, Docket No. 2024-50-4774

Employee,

v.

UNITED MECHANICAL AND

ELECTRIC, INC., State File No. 38361-2024

Employer,

and

ACCIDENT FUND INS. CO. OF

AMERICA, Judge Robert Durham

Carrier.

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING BENEFITS

On March 4, 2026, the Court held an expedited hearing to determine whether

Mr. Saddler is likely to prove that he suffered an injury arising primarily out of his

employment with United Mechanical. For the reasons below, the Court finds Mr.

Saddler did not meet his burden of proof as to causation and denies his claim for

benefits at this time.

History of Claim

This case is unusual because Mr. Saddler had no memory of how he injured

himself or anything else that happened on May 29, 2024. He only knew that he

worked for United Mechanical as a heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning

installer working at a construction site in Clarksville. He did not present any

witnesses to the incident or what led to emergency medical services being called to

the site.

While emergency personnel were treating Mr. Saddler, he experienced

symptoms that raised concerns of a seizure. He was intubated, sedated, and taken

by helicopter to the hospital, where he was diagnosed with a subdural hematoma and

multiple skull fractures. The emergency record stated that Mr. Saddler had

1

“evidence of a significant [closed-head injury] after a fall from 8 feet at 10:30. The

patient reportedly had a non-syncopal fall onto an unknown type of surface at

10:30.” The record continues that Mr. Saddler’s history was “limited to Life Flight

as the patient is intubated and sedated.”

The hospital also conducted a drug screen that was “presumptively positive”

for cannabinoids, although no levels of the drug or evidence of a confirmatory test

were provided. Mr. Saddler testified that he had used vapes with cannabinoids in

the past, but the last time he recalled doing so was at least a week before his injury.

He said that he had never gone to work intoxicated. He also testified that he had

suffered a traumatic brain injury in the past that caused headaches, but he had never

had a seizure.

United Mechanical’s owner testified that on the day of the injury, the company

had been certified as a Tennessee Drug-Free Workplace. He provided a Drug Free

Workplace Application form dated July 26, 2023.

The only description of the incident was contained in Dr. Jeffrey Hazlewood’s

independent medical evaluation report. He said Mr. Saddler’s wife advised that a

coworker told her she was in another room when she heard a “commotion.” She ran

into the other room and found Mr. Saddler unconscious and “apparently he had fallen

off a ladder.” Dr. Hazlewood concluded his report by stating that Mr. Saddler was

not at maximum medical improvement and required additional treatment.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Saddler must prove a likelihood of prevailing at a hearing on the merits.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2025).

To prove causation, Mr. Saddler must establish that he suffered an injury

caused by a specific incident . . . arising primarily out of and in the course and scope

of employment. This means he must prove that his employment contributed more

than 50% in causing the disablement or need for treatment, “considering all causes.”

Id. § 50-6-102(12)(A)-(B).

Mr. Saddler has shown that he suffered a serious head injury at work.

However, he must still prove that his injury arose primarily out of his employment

and contributed more than 50% in causing his disablement or need for treatment.

An “idiopathic injury” is “one that has an unexplained origin or cause and

generally does not arise out of the employment unless some condition of the

employment presents a peculiar or additional hazard.” Miller v. Logan’s Roadhouse,

Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 59, at *9 (Nov. 15, 2018). The “focus

2

is on the causal link between the employment and the accident or injury, rather than

a causal link between the employment and the idiopathic episode.” Id.

In Miller, the employee asserted that he fell because fumes and heat caused

him to pass out. He did not have medical proof supporting that assertion but was

able to prove that he was injured because he struck some shelves. Thus, his injury

was “causally related to some incident to the employment,” i.e., the additional hazard

created by the shelves. The Board held the proof was enough at the interlocutory

stage to award benefits. Id. at *10.

Here, Mr. Saddler has offered no evidence as to why he fell. Further, he has

not established any hazard causally related to his injury that was peculiar to his

employment. The only accounts of the incident were speculation and inadmissible

hearsay. But even if they were admissible, they would still not be enough to meet

Mr. Sadler’s burden. Without any admissible evidence linking his employment to

either his fall or his injury, other than the fact that the injury occurred at the

construction site, the Court cannot find at this time that Mr. Saddler is likely to prove

causation at trial.1

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Mr. Saddler’s request for benefits is denied.

2. This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on May 13, 2026, at 9:00 a.m.

Central Time. The parties must call 615-253-0010. Failure to appear

might result in a determination of the issues without the party’s

participation.

ENTERED March 20, 2026.

____________________________________

JUDGE ROBERT DURHAM

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

Exhibits:

1. Dr. Hazlewood’s IME report

2. Wage Statement

1

Because the claim is denied on causation grounds, the Court need not address United

Mechanical’s intoxication defense at this time.

3

3. Notice of Denial

4. Vanderbilt Records

5. Drug Free Workplace Acceptance Notice

4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent on March 20, 2026.

Name Email Service sent to:

Lauren Ray X lray@forthepeople.com

Gordon Aulgur Gordon.aulgur@afgroup.com

X

Christine.Spear@afgroup.com

___________________________________

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

5

Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation

Appeals Board. To do so, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.

¾ If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the

order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed

within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed.

¾ If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues

in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of

the date the Compensation Order was filed.

When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney,

if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar

days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office

or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an

Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office)

seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency

within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing

fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. If no court

reporter was present at the hearing, you may request from the Court Clerk the audio

recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If you choose to submit a transcript as part of your

appeal, which the Appeals Board has emphasized is important for a meaningful review of

the case, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript, and you must file it with the

Court Clerk. The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board,

and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. For deadlines related to the filing of

transcripts, statements of the evidence, and briefs on appeal, see the applicable rules on the

Bureau’s website at https://www.tn.gov/wcappealsboard. (Click the “Read Rules” button.)

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the Court Order

becomes enforceable. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(3) (expedited/interlocutory

orders) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7) (compensation orders).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board;ĐŚĞĐŬŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞďŽdžĞƐĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞĚĂƚĞĨŝůĞͲ

ƐƚĂŵƉĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĨŝƌƐƚƉĂŐĞŽĨƚŚĞŽƌĚĞƌ;ƐͿďĞŝŶŐĂƉƉĞĂůĞĚͿ͗

ප Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ ප Motion Order filed on ___________________

ප Compensation Order filed on__________________ ප Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.