Opinion

Collins, Randall v. Allsouth Appliance Group, Inc.

  • 2026 TN WC 20
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Status
Published
On the bench
Wyatt
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Mar 12, 2026

02:20 PM(ET)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT CHATTANOOGA

Randall Collins, ) Docket No. 2024-10-7878

Employee, )

v. )

Allsouth Appliance Group, Inc., ) State File No. 33527-2021

Employer, )

and )

Safety National Casualty Corp., ) Judge Thomas Wyatt

Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

(DECISION ON THE RECORD)

On March 11, 2026, the Court considered Randall Collins’s request for

authorization of a new pain management specialist because the authorized pain

specialist has no further treatment to offer. Allsouth countered that Mr. Collins is

not entitled to the requested relief because the specialist is still willing to treat him.

For the reasons below, the Court denies the requested relief.

History of the Claim

Mr. Collins injured his right knee at work in April 2021. Allsouth authorized

treatment with Dr. Jason Rogers, who performed knee-replacement and revision

surgeries. In April 2025, Dr. Rogers referred him to a pain specialist, and Mr.

Collins selected Dr. Scott Baker from a panel.

Dr. Baker treated Mr. Collins through October 21, 2025. At the last

appointment, Mr. Collins reported a pain level of seven when performing activities

and did not complain of side effects from prescribed medications. Dr. Baker

determined he was not a candidate for opioids, placed him at maximum medical

improvement, and wrote, “No further treatment recommended.” However, he did

1

prescribe a steroid dose pack and an antidepressant, with no refills, and wrote,

“return visit request in/on 1 mo. +/- 2 days.”

Mr. Collins interpreted Dr. Baker’s note as a discharge and returned to Dr.

Rogers in April 2025. Dr. Rogers referred him to another pain specialist. Allsouth

did not authorize that treatment, arguing that Dr. Baker remains the authorized

treating pain specialist.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

To recover, Mr. Collins must show that he will likely prevail at a hearing on

the merits that Dr. Baker discharged him from treatment. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-

239(d)(1) (2025).

Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(ii) permits the treating

physician, Dr. Rogers, to make a referral for specialty care. Dr. Rogers made a pain

management referral that Allsouth complied with by providing a panel, and Mr.

Collins selected Dr. Baker. As for treatment with Dr. Baker, subsection

204(a)(3)(D)(ii) provides,

In all cases where the treating physician has referred the employee to a

[specialist physician, the specialist physician] to which the employee

has been referred, or selected from a panel provided by the employer,

shall become the treating physician until treatment by the [specialty

physician] concludes and the employee has been referred back to the

treating physician selected by the employee from the initial panel[.]

(Emphasis added).

In Cook v. Newton Nissan of Gallatin/Newton Ford, LLC, 2023 TN Wrk.

Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 12, at *21-22 (Feb. 22, 2023), the employee sought care

from another pain specialist because the authorized pain specialist testified he could

not explain the employee’s ongoing pain and had done all he could. The authorized

pain specialist offered to refer the employee back to the previous treating physician

but also agreed to see the employee again to consider future treatment options.

Because of this agreement, the employer argued that the pain specialist continued to

be the authorized treating doctor.

The Appeals Board held that the dispositive issue was whether the referral

physician was qualified, willing, and able to treat the employee’s work injury in a

2

timely manner. Under the above facts, the Board affirmed the trial court’s decision

that the employee was entitled to a new panel of pain specialists.

Here, unlike Cook, when Dr. Baker last saw Mr. Collins, he prescribed

medication and expected a return appointment in 30 days. This shows that Dr. Baker

did not refuse to treat him. Further, Dr. Baker did not refer Mr. Collins back to Dr.

Rogers as required to terminate a referral physician’s responsibility to treat an

employee. Finally, the Court does not interpret the statement in the report about no

further treatment recommendations as a discharge or refusal to treat, especially since

Dr. Baker prescribed medication and a return visit.

The referral statute mandates that Mr. Collins seek treatment for his pain from

Dr. Baker if he expects Allsouth to pay for it. That mandate will stay in place until

Dr. Baker refers him back to Dr. Rogers or declines to see him again. Thus, the

Court holds that Mr. Collins has not shown that he will prevail at a hearing on the

merits in proving that he has a right to change pain management specialists.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Mr. Collins’s request for authorization to change pain management physicians

is denied.

2. The parties shall appear for a status hearing on June 23, 2026, at 10:00 a.m.

Eastern Time/9:00 a.m. Central Time. They must call (615) 741-3061 or

(855) 747-1721 to participate. Failure to call might result in a determination

of the issues without the party’s participation.

ENTERED March 12, 2026.

_____________________________________

Judge Thomas Wyatt

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

3

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Affidavit of Randall D. Collins

2. Referral Order to Dr. Dreskin

3. Dr. Jason Rogers’s note of April 8, 2025

4. Pain Management Panel

5. Dr. Scott Baker’s note of October 21, 2025

6. November 10, 2025 email from Attorney Baker to Attorney Wagner

4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Order was sent as indicated on March 12, 2026.

Name Email Service sent to:

Mike Wagner X maw@wagnerinjurylaw.com

Employee’s Attorney

Fredrick R. Baker X fbaker@wimberlylawson.com

Employer’s Attorney bcopeland@wimberlylawson.com

___________________________________

Penny Shrum, Court Clerk

Wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

5

Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation

Appeals Board. To do so, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.

 If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the

order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed

within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed.

 If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues

in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of

the date the Compensation Order was filed.

When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney,

if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar

days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office

or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an

Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office)

seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency

within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing

fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. If no court

reporter was present at the hearing, you may request from the Court Clerk the audio

recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If you choose to submit a transcript as part of your

appeal, which the Appeals Board has emphasized is important for a meaningful review of

the case, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript, and you must file it with the

Court Clerk. The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board,

and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. For deadlines related to the filing of

transcripts, statements of the evidence, and briefs on appeal, see the applicable rules on the

Bureau’s website at https://www.tn.gov/wcappealsboard. (Click the “Read Rules” button.)

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the Court Order

becomes enforceable. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(3) (expedited/interlocutory

orders) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7) (compensation orders).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-

stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________

□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.