Opinion

Jane Doe, C.D., Etc. v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC

Court
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Filed
Feb 17, 2026
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

RECORD IMPOUNDED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited . R. 1:36-3.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-0181-24

JANE DOE, C.D., c/o

LAFFEY BUCCI & KENT, LLP,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MASSAGE ENVY FRANCHISING,

LLC, and SUMMERWIND

MASSAGE, LLC, d/b/a

MASSAGE ENVY CLOSTER,

Defendants-Respondents.

_____________________________

MASSAGE ENVY FRANCHISING,

LLC,

Third-Party Plaintiff-

Respondent,

v.

MICHAEL EGAN,

Third-Party Defendant.

______________________________

Submitted February 3, 2026 – Decided February 17, 2026

Before Judges Gooden Brown and Rose.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law

Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L-0440-20.

Brian D. Kent (Laffey Bucci D'Andrea Reich & Ryan,

LLP) and M. Stewart Ryan (Laffey Bucci D'Andrea

Reich & Ryan, LLP), attorneys for appellant.

Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis, LLP, attorneys for

respondents (Darren C. Barreiro, Kersten Kortbawi, of

counsel and on the brief).

PER CURIAM

The parties to the appeal have settled the issues between them. In

accordance with the stipulation they have filed, the appeal is dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dismissed.

A-0181-24

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.