Opinion

GUFFEY, CHARLES V. HAREN CONSTRUCTION, INC.

  • 2026 TN WC 9
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Feb 3, 2026
Status
Published
On the bench
Durham
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Feb 03, 2026

01:45 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT COOKEVILLE

CHARLES GUFFEY, ) Docket No.: 2024-40-8572

Employee, )

v. ) State File No.: 860001-2025

)

HAREN CONSTRUCTION, ) Judge Robert Durham

INC., )

Employer, )

And )

)

AMERISURE INS. CO., )

Insurer. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING BENEFITS

The Court held an Expedited Hearing on January 20, 2026, to determine whether

Haren Construction owes Mr. Guffey additional temporary total and partial disability

benefits and his entitlement to attorney’s fees. The Court finds that Mr. Guffey is likely to

prove at trial that he is entitled to additional temporary disability benefits but an award of

attorney’s fees is not warranted at this stage.

Stipulations

Haren agreed for the purpose of this hearing as follows:

 Mr. Guffey suffered a compensable injury to his left arm on February 13, 2024.

 He is entitled to payment of his medical expenses related to his hospital stay and

treatment from Dr. Craig Saunders and Dr. Todd Rubin.

 Haren shall pay Mr. Guffey temporary total disability benefits from February 19,

2024, through March 22, 2024, plus a 25% penalty under Tennessee Code

Annotated section 50-6-205(b)(3)(A) in the amount of $5,830.93.

1

History of Claim

Mr. Guffey worked as a foreman for Haren, operating heavy equipment and

performing other manual tasks. He suffered a puncture wound to his left forearm at work,

and it became infected due partly to his uncontrolled diabetes.

Mr. Guffey went to the hospital on February 19, and Dr. Saunders performed

emergency surgery to clean out the infection. Mr. Guffey recovered, but at the hearing he

produced a picture taken on March 15 (approximately one month after the appointment)

that showed a significant open wound in his forearm.

Dr. Saunders last saw Mr. Guffey on March 22. He noted that Mr. Guffey still had

an open wound that required wet/dry dressing and antibiotics. Mr. Guffey still had grip

strength weakness but improved range of motion. Dr. Saunders testified that Mr. Guffey

told him that day that he wanted to return to work and he “did not have a reason for him

not to return to work.” However, he recommended use of a protective splint and bandaging.

Dr. Saunders also testified that he speculated when he earlier agreed with a letter

from Mr. Guffey’s attorney stating that Mr. Guffey could not have returned to work until

November 1, 2024. He confirmed that he was unaware of Mr. Guffey’s statement to a

healthcare provider in June 2024 that his wound took three months instead of nine to fully

heal.

During cross-examination, Dr. Saunders explained the return-to-work issue. He

recommended a “wrist cock-up splint” to “help support the wrist to prevent any kind of

trauma, especially if he fell. You know, God forbid that caused the wound to dehisce. It

would just pop open.”

He warned Mr. Guffey about returning to work. When specifically asked about Mr.

Guffey working in construction while he still had an open wound, Dr. Saunders said he

would not have wanted him to risk exposure, although a splint and a glove would have

offered some protection. Dr. Saunders ordered physical therapy because it would have

assisted Mr. Guffey in regaining strength and range of motion. He agreed that Mr. Guffey’s

current assertions of continued weakness and loss of motion were consistent with his

injury.

Mr. Guffey also testified about his temporary disability after his injury. He said that

he attempted to return to work for Haren on March 25. However, every task required use

of his left arm. He also had to keep his wound clean and avoid the dirt, grease, and oil

common to a construction environment.

Mr. Guffey said that he had only been on the jobsite for a few hours when his

supervisor terminated him and Haren denied his workers’ compensation claim. Mr. Guffey

2

did not immediately find other employment.

On June 26, he visited the local health department complaining of uncontrolled

diabetes and a large ulcer. He told a nurse practitioner that he recently had a puncture

wound in his arm that caused a “nasty infection” that took three months to fully heal. Mr.

Guffey received treatment for his diabetes and ulcer and was released to return to work on

November 1.

Mr. Guffey testified that he went to work for a tree service on November 1. The job

paid $10.00 less per hour than Haren, so he made $400 less per week. Mr. Guffey worked

there until February 3, 2025, when he got a job driving a truck making the same wages as

with Haren.

More than a year from his injury and after several months of litigation, Haren

accepted Mr. Guffey’s claim and authorized orthopedist Todd Rubin to treat him. Dr.

Rubin saw Mr. Guffey on September 26, 2025. Mr. Guffey complained of pain, weakness,

and stiffness in his left hand and wrist. Examination revealed some atrophy and loss of

strength as well as diminished sensation along the median nerve suggestive of entrapment.

However, the record noted full range of motion.

Dr. Rubin diagnosed “likely” post-traumatic infection symptoms or progressive scar

tissue over the median nerve. He prescribed occupational therapy for both the pain and

loss of motion and released Mr. Guffy to return to work without restrictions.

In November 2025, counsel asked Dr. Rubin to answer a series of “medical

questionnaires.” In them, he said that Mr. Guffey has not reached maximum medical

improvement. As for temporary total disability, Dr. Rubin listed February 19, 2024,

through March 22, 2024, as the dates Mr. Guffey should have been “off work completely.”

Mr. Guffey testified that he has worked with heavy equipment for most of his life.

At the time of his termination, he did not believe he could do the job at Haren due to his

inability to use his left hand. After he was fired, he did not immediately look for work

because he did not think he could perform the essential functions of a heavy equipment

operator. He could not make a fist with his left hand or even tie his shoes. He said the

only reason he stayed out of work for as long as he did was due to his left hand.

Currently his range of motion and strength in his left hand are about half of his right.

While he now makes the same wages as with Haren, he had to switch careers.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

To obtain the requested temporary disability benefits, Mr. Guffey must show a

likelihood of prevailing at a hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1)

3

(2025). He must prove: (1) a disability from working as the result of a compensable injury;

(2) a causal connection between the injury and the inability to work; and (3) the duration

of the period of disability. Shepherd v. Haren Const. Co., Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App.

Bd. LEXIS 15, at *13 (Mar. 30, 2016). Where the disability is not total, the employee may

recover temporary partial disability benefits if the employee is able to resume some gainful

employment but has not reached maximum recovery. Id. In addition to lay testimony, Mr.

Guffey must also have an expert medical opinion to establish the necessary elements.

The Court first considers temporary total disability benefits. Dr. Rubin is the

authorized treating physician, whose opinion is entitled to a presumption of correctness.

Id. § 50-6-102(12)(E). He said he believed Mr. Guffey was “off work completely” from

February 19 through March 22, 2024. Dr. Saunders also released Mr. Guffey to return to

work on March 22. Thus, the Court finds that Mr. Guffey is likely to prove entitlement to

temporary total disability benefits from February 19 through March 22. Haren has already

agreed to pay these benefits.

However, the Court must also decide whether Mr. Guffey is entitled to temporary

partial disability benefits. On this issue, Dr. Saunders’s testimony is significant.

While Dr. Saunders testified that he released Mr. Guffey to return to work on March

22, it was mostly due to Mr. Guffey’s insistence. He was reluctant to do so, given that Mr.

Guffey’s wound was still open and subject to infection, particularly due to his uncontrolled

diabetes. He was also afraid that any stress on the left arm could cause the wound to “God

forbid” dehisce or “burst open.” Thus, his deposition testimony is clear that Mr. Guffey

needed to keep his left arm covered and not stressed until the wound closed.

Mr. Guffey’s undisputed testimony was that Haren could not or would not

accommodate those restrictions when it terminated him. Further, the evidence showed that

it took three months for his wound to completely heal, which was corroborated by his

statement to the health department in June. Given that his injury occurred on February 13,

three months afterward would be May 13, 2024. Thus, the Court finds that Mr. Guffey is

likely to prove entitlement to temporary total and partial disability benefits from February

13 through May 13, 2024. Because Haren failed to pay temporary benefits it owed Mr.

Guffey, it awards him an additional 25% under section 50-6-205(b)(3)(A).

Mr. Guffey argued that he is entitled to additional total disability benefits until

November 1 and temporary partial disability until February 3, 2025. However, while he

testified that he could not have worked until November 1 due to strength and range-of-

motion limitations, he did not submit any expert opinion to support his lay testimony.

Finally, Mr. Guffey also requested attorney’s fees under Tennessee Code Annotated

section 50-6-226(d)(1)(B) on the grounds that Haren unreasonably denied his request for

benefits. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board has encouraged consideration of

4

attorney’s fees at the end of the claim. Andrews v. Yates Servs., Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp.

App. Bd. LEXIS 35, at *7-8 (May 23, 2017). This request is denied at this time.

5

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED:

1. Haren Construction shall pay all medical expenses related to Mr. Guffey’s

hospital stay and treatment by Dr. Saunders. Haren shall pay for all reasonable

and necessary medical treatment provided or recommended by Dr. Rubin for

treatment of Mr. Guffey’s work-related injury. Haren shall also pay any

reasonable and necessary mileage expenses submitted by Mr. Guffey.

2. Haren shall pay $13,542.81 in temporary total disability benefits from February

13, 2024 through May 13, 2024. Under section 50-6-205(b)(3)(A), Haren shall

pay an additional 25% of this award or $3,385.71. The total award is $16,928.52.

If Haren has already paid $5,830.90, it is entitled to a credit and shall pay Mr.

Guffey an additional $11,097.62. Mr. Guffey’s counsel is entitled to $2,219.52

in attorney’s fees from the additional amount.

3. This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on March 30, 2026, at 9:00 a.m.

Central Time. The parties must call 615-253-0010. Failure to appear might

result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

4. Unless an interlocutory appeal is filed, compliance must occur by seven business

days of entry of this order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-

6-239(d)(3).

ENTERED February 3, 2026.

_____________________________________

ROBERT DURHAM, JUDGE

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

6

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Dr. Saunders’s deposition.

2. Dr. Rubin’s response to questionnaire about permanent impairment.

3. Picture of Mr. Guffey’s arm dated February 28, 2024

4. Picture of Mr. Guffey’s arm dated March 15, 2024

5. Overton County Health Department record

6. Additional Overton County Health Department records

7. Release to return to work form from Overton County Health Department

8. Responses to medical questionnaires from Dr. Rubin

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Order was sent as indicated on February 3, 2026.

Name Certified Via Via Service sent to:

Mail Fax Email

Allen Grant X agrant@hrslawga.com

Jeffrey Rufalo X jrufolo@summersfirm.com

_____________________________________

PENNY SHRUM, Court Clerk

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

7

Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation

Appeals Board. To do so, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.

¾ If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the

order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed

within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed.

¾ If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues

in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of

the date the Compensation Order was filed.

When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney,

if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar

days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office

or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an

Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office)

seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency

within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing

fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. If no court

reporter was present at the hearing, you may request from the Court Clerk the audio

recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If you choose to submit a transcript as part of your

appeal, which the Appeals Board has emphasized is important for a meaningful review of

the case, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript, and you must file it with the

Court Clerk. The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board,

and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. For deadlines related to the filing of

transcripts, statements of the evidence, and briefs on appeal, see the applicable rules on the

Bureau’s website at https://www.tn.gov/wcappealsboard. (Click the “Read Rules” button.)

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the Court Order

becomes enforceable. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(3) (expedited/interlocutory

orders) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7) (compensation orders).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board;ĐŚĞĐŬŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞďŽdžĞƐĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞĚĂƚĞĨŝůĞͲ

ƐƚĂŵƉĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĨŝƌƐƚƉĂŐĞŽĨƚŚĞŽƌĚĞƌ;ƐͿďĞŝŶŐĂƉƉĞĂůĞĚͿ͗

ප Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ ප Motion Order filed on ___________________

ප Compensation Order filed on__________________ ප Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.