Opinion

Opinion

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Jan 5, 2026
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 38.0%

an affidavit claiming poverty in support of a motion made under 8 28 U.S.C. § 1915 must state the relevant facts “with some particularity, definiteness, and 9 certainty”

How later courts described this case

  • an affidavit claiming poverty in support of a motion made under 8 28 U.S.C. § 1915 must state the relevant facts “with some particularity, definiteness, and 9 certainty”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 MOHIBULLAH AHMADZAI, Case No. 2:25-cv-02625-DC-CSK

12 Plaintiff,

13 v. ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO PROCEED

14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., IFP

15 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 2, 3)

16

17 Plaintiff Mohibullah Ahmadzai is representing himself in this action and seeks

18 leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.1 (ECF No. 2.)

19 For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s request to proceed IFP

20 without prejudice.

21 I. LEGAL STANDARDS

22 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in any district court of the

23 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee. See

24 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay the filing fee

25 only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

26 § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v.

27

1 This matter proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, Fed. R.

28 Civ. P. 72, and Local Rule 302(c).

1 Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). To qualify to proceed in forma pauperis, the

2 litigant must submit an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets they possess.

3 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The affidavit must also state that the person is unable to pay the

4 fees or give security. Id. The affidavit must provide “sufficient details concerning [the

5 applicant’s] income, assets, and expenditures[.]” Williams v. Cnty. of Ventura, 443 F.

6 App’x 232, 233 (9th Cir. 2011) (citing United States v. McQuade, 647 F.2d 938, 940 (9th

7 Cir. 1981) (an affidavit claiming poverty in support of a motion made under

8 28 U.S.C. § 1915 must state the relevant facts “with some particularity, definiteness, and

9 certainty”).

10 II. DISCUSSION

11 A. Plaintiff’s Request to Proceed IFP

12 Plaintiff’s IFP application indicates he receives the following income:

13 approximately $1,578/monthly in Cash Aid; approximately $906/monthly in CalFresh;

14 and $9,400 in Financial Aid for “Fall 2025.” ECF No. 2 ¶ 3. It is not clear how many

15 months Plaintiff’s financial aid covers to determine whether Plaintiff is unable to pay the

16 fees or give security as required pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Plaintiff's IFP

17 application lacks sufficient detail to establish that he is entitled to prosecute this case

18 without paying the required fees. See Williams, 443 F. App’x at 233. Plaintiff will be

19 provided an opportunity to file an amended IFP application. Therefore, Plaintiff’s request

20 to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal.

21 Plaintiff is warned that failure to pay the filing fee or submit a complete IFP application

22 with sufficient detail by the prescribed deadline may result in a recommendation that this

23 action be dismissed.

24 B. Plaintiff’s Request for Service

25 Plaintiff has also filed a request for service of the summons and Complaint. (ECF

26 No. 3.) This request is premature as the Court must first determine whether IFP is

27 appropriate and if it is, the Court must screen the complaint and dismiss any claims that

28 are frivolous or malicious, fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seek

1 | monetary relief against an immune defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Accordingly,

2 | Plaintiff's request for service (ECF No. 3) is DENIED as premature.

3 | Ill. CONCLUSION

4 In accordance with the above, IT |S ORDERED that:

5 1. Plaintiff's request for service (ECF No. 3) is DENIED as premature;

6 2. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED

7 without prejudice; and

8 3. Plaintiff must pay the filing fee or file a complete and signed application to

9 proceed IFP within thirty (30) days from the date of this order.

10

11 | Dated: January 5, 2026 C ii $ \U

12 CHI SOO KIM

43 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14 || 4, ahma2625.25

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.