Opinion

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court
United States Court of Federal Claims
Filed
Dec 30, 2025
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Brian H. Corcoran
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 25-317V

ELEANOR BROWN, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner,

v. Filed: November 24, 2025

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On February 21, 2025, Eleanor Brown filed a petition for compensation the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 34.2

Petitioner alleged that she suffered injuries after receiving human papillomavirus

vaccinations on February 21, 2022, March 2022 (no specific date provided), and

January 2, 2024. ECF No. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine

Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “that the petitioner may withdraw the petition

under section 300aa—21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section

300aa—21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master.” 42

U.S.C. § 300aa—12(g). On November 19, 2025, Petitioner timely filed a notice to

withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—21(b).

In light of Petitioner’s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

300aa—21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner’s request to withdraw the

petition is GRANTED. Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that

proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment

“on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

1 Because this Order contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or

at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government

Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic

Government Services). This means the Order will be available to anyone with access to the internet.

In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or

other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon

review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public

access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.