Opinion

Brown

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Sep 22, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 36.1%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 DOMINQUE ZAFIR CASEY, No. 1:23-cv-01068 JLT SAB (PC)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

13 v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

14 SGT. BROWN, et al.,

(Docs. 34, 37)

15 Defendants.

16

17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant

18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28

19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20 On August 28, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations

21 that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. (Doc. 37.) The magistrate judge

22 reasoned that Defendants presented sufficient evidence to meet their burden of showing that there

23 is no genuine issue of material fact because Plaintiff’s excessive force claims are barred by his

24 guilty plea in criminal court under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). (Id. at 8.) The Court

25 served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any objections were

26 due within 14 days. (Doc. 37 at 14.) The Court advised him that the “failure to file objections

27 within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id., citing Wilkerson v.

28

1 Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014).) Plaintiff did not file objections, and the time to

2 | has passed.

3 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of this case.

4 | Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations

5 || are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS:

6 1. The findings and recommendations issued on August 28, 2025, (Doc. 37), are

7 ADOPTED IN FULL.

8 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 34), is GRANTED.

9 3. Judgment is entered in Defendants’ favor, and that the Clerk of Court is directed to

10 close this case.

11

b IT IS SO ORDERED.

13 | Dated: _September 22, 2025 Cerin | Tower

TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.