Opinion

(PC) Rodriguez v. State of California

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Sep 3, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.1%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 RAYMOND ALBERT RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:25-cv-1141 CKD P

12 Plaintiff,

13 v. ORDER

14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

15 Defendants.

16

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

18 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

19 636(b)(1).

20 Plaintiff requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis. As plaintiff has submitted a

21 declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), his request will be granted.

22 Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§

23 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By separate order, the court will direct the appropriate agency to collect the

24 initial partial filing fee from plaintiff’s trust account and forward it to the Clerk of the Court.

25 Thereafter, plaintiff will be obligated for monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding

26 month’s income credited to plaintiff’s prison trust account. These payments will be forwarded by

27 the appropriate agency to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in plaintiff’s account

28 exceeds $10.00, until the filing fee is paid in full. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

1 The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a

2 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The

3 court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally

4 “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek

5 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2).

6 The court has reviewed plaintiff’s complaint and finds that plaintiff may proceed on a

7 claim against defendant Ho arising under the Fourteenth Amendment for Ho being at least

8 deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s exposure to unsanitary conditions of confinement. Plaintiff

9 has two options: (1) proceed on that claim; or (2) seek leave to file an amended complaint in an

10 attempt to cure deficiencies with respect to other claims.

11 In deciding whether to amend, plaintiff is informed as follows:

12 1. The State of California is not an appropriate defendant in this action because, among

13 other things, the events described took place in the Sacramento County Jail.

14 2. Plaintiff names Sacramento County as a defendant. Municipalities cannot be held

15 vicariously liable under § 1983 for the actions of their employees. Monell v. Dep’t of Social

16 Services, 436 U.S. 585 at 691, 694 (1978). “Instead, it is when execution of a government's

17 policy or custom, whether made by its lawmakers or by those whose edicts or acts may fairly be

18 said to represent official policy, inflicts the injury that the government as an entity is responsible

19 under § 1983.” Id. at 694.

20 3. Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) “prohibit[s] discrimination on

21 the basis of disability.” Lovell v. Chandler, 303 F.3d 1039, 1052 (9th Cir. 2002). “To establish a

22 violation of Title II of the ADA, a plaintiff must show that (1) [he] is a qualified individual with a

23 disability; (2) [he] was excluded from participation in or otherwise discriminated against with

24 regard to a public entity’s services, programs, or activities; and (3) such exclusion or

25 discrimination was by reason of [his] disability.” Lovell, 303 F.3d at 1052. Plaintiff asserts a

26 violation of the ADA but does not show exclusion or discrimination because of a disability.

27 4. There can be no liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 unless there is some affirmative link

28 or connection between a defendant’s actions and the claimed deprivation. Rizzo v. Goode, 423

1 || U.S. 362 (1976). Furthermore, vague and conclusory allegations of official participation in civil

2 || rights violations against supervisors simply because they are in charge are not sufficient. Ivey v.

3 || Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). There is no vicarious liability in a § 1983

4 || action.

5 Finally, plaintiff is informed that the court cannot refer to a prior pleading in order to

6 || make plaintiff's amended complaint complete. Local Rule 220 requires that an amended

7 || complaint be complete in itself without reference to any prior pleading.

8 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

9 1. Plaintiffs request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED.

10 2. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. All fees

11 | shall be collected and paid in accordance with this court’s order to the Director of the California

12 || Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation filed concurrently herewith.

13 3. Plaintiffis granted 21 days within which to complete and return the attached form

14 | notifying the court whether he wants to proceed on a claim against defendant Ho arising under the

15 || Fourteenth Amendment for Ho being at least deliberately indifferent to plaintiff's exposure to

16 || unsanitary conditions of confinement and voluntarily dismiss all other claims or (2) file an

17 || amended complaint in an attempt to cure the deficiencies in his complaint with respect to his

18 | other claims. If plaintiff does not return the form, this action will proceed on the claims described

19 || above and the court will recommend all other claims and defendants be dismissed.

20 | Dated: September 3, 2025 ( a8 } Kt | / } a a

22 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

23

24

25 rodt! 141.option

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

8

9 RAYMOND ALBERT RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:25-cv-1141 CKD P

10 Plaintiff,

11 v. PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF

12 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., HOW TO PROCEED

13 Defendants.

14

Check one:

15

_____ Plaintiff wants to proceed on a claim against defendant Ho arising under the Fourteenth

16

Amendment for Ho being at least deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s exposure to unsanitary

17

conditions of confinement; OR

18

_____ Plaintiff wants time to file an amended complaint.

19

DATED:

20

21 ________________________________

Plaintiff

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.