Opinion

Leach v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision

  • 94 Ohio St. 3d 170
  • 2002 Ohio 341
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 30, 2002
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.0%

The opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 170.]

LEACH, APPELLANT, v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL.,

APPELLEES.

[Cite as Leach v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2002-Ohio-341.]

Taxation—Real property—Appeal of county auditor’s valuation to board of

revision—Failure of property owner to appear at hearing is proper

ground for dismissal of complaint—LCL Income Properties v. Rhodes,

followed.

(No. 01-291—Submitted January 9, 2002—Decided January 30, 2002.)

APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2000-M-1049 through

2000-M-1256.

__________________

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} Appellant David Leach filed multiple complaints with the Hamilton

County Board of Revision (“BOR”) for tax year 1999. Leach was notified by the

BOR of the time and place for the hearings on the complaints; however, he never

appeared at any of the hearings. The BOR dismissed Leach’s complaints. Leach

filed appeals of the BOR’s dismissals with the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”). At

the BTA, the BOR filed a motion for sanctions wherein it sought affirmance of the

BOR’s dismissals and the imposition of attorney fees. The BTA granted the motion

for dismissal but denied the motion for sanctions. Leach appealed here but did not

appear at the oral hearing scheduled before this court. This cause is now before

this court upon an appeal as of right.

{¶ 2} In LCL Income Properties v. Rhodes (1995), 71 Ohio St.3d 652, 646

N.E.2d 1108, as in this case, the taxpayer failed to appear at the board of revision

hearing and the BOR dismissed the complaint for failure to prosecute. In LCL

Properties, we stated that the board of revision had authority to dismiss the

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

complaint. The taxpayer fails to sustain the burden to prove the value of the

property when he or she fails to attend the hearing before the board of revision.

Under LCL Properties, the BTA’s affirmance of the BOR’s dismissals was

reasonable and lawful.

Decision affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and

LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

__________________

David Leach, pro se.

Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Thomas J.

Scheve, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee Hamilton County Auditor.

__________________

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.