Opinion

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 237 Health & Welfare Fund v. Freedom Electrical Construction

Court
District Court, W.D. New York
Filed
Sep 29, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 39.6%

Motions to compel are “entrusted to the sound discretion of the district court.”

How later courts described this case

  • Motions to compel are “entrusted to the sound discretion of the district court.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF

ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 237 HEALTH

& WELFARE FUND, ET AL.,

24-CV-644 LJV(Sr)

Plaintiffs,

v.

FREEDOM ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION,

Defendant.

DECISION AND ORDER

This case was referred to the undersigned by the Hon. Lawrence J.

Vilardo, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), for all pretrial matters and to hear and report

upon dispositive motions. Dkt. #11.

Plaintiffs commenced this action on July 10, 2024 seeking contributions,

deductions, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs pursuant to the

Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C.

§ 1132(g)(2), and the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C.

§ 185(a). Dkt. #1.

Defendant did not answer the complaint and, upon request by plaintiffs,

the Clerk of the Court entered Default on September 12, 2024. Dkt. #7.

Currently before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion to compel defendant to

disclose its books and records from October 1, 2019 through the present for plaintiffs’

review and audit. Dkt. #9. In support of the motion, plaintiffs proffer letters dated

November 8, 2023 and April 3, 2024 seeking disclosure of defendant’s payroll records

and other financial records to its auditor to verify contributions on hours worked by

employees to the plaintiffs. Dkt. #9-2 & 9-3. Plaintiffs affirm that defendant has not

provided the requested information. Dkt. #9, ¶ 6. Plaintiffs argue that disclosure of this

information is required to permit them to conduct an audit as provided in collective

bargaining agreement (“CBA”), and to assess any amount that may be due so that

plaintiffs can move for default judgment. Dkt. #9-4.

Plaintiffs filed a certificate of service indicating that the motion papers

were served upon defendant by mail. Dkt. #10. In addition, the Court mailed a copy of

the text order directing defendant to respond to the motion. Dkt. #12. No response has

been received.

Plaintiffs subsequently filed an affidavit from the Funds Administrator

attaching a copy of the CBA and defendant’s assent to the CBA (Dkt. #14, Exh. A), as

well as the Collections Policy requiring that a company disclose its books and records to

plaintiffs’ auditors upon request. Dkt. #14, Exh. B. The Funds Administrator also

attaches a determination from the National Labor Relations Board that defendant

committed unfair labor practices by failing to comply with contractual wage and fringe

benefit provisions under the CBA. Dkt. #14, Exh. C. Despite this determination, the

Funds Administrator affirms that plaintiffs have not received any of the contributions

-2-

and deductions required. Dkt. #14, p.7, ¶ 15. More specifically, the Funds Administrator

affirms that defendant has not remitted fringe benefit contributions and deductions due

for work in covered employment since October 1, 2019. Dkt. #14, p.7, ¶ 16.

Plaintiffs are clearly entitled to audit defendant’s books and records

pursuant to the Funds’ Collections Policy. Dkt. #14, Exh. B. Moreover, courts routinely

compel an audit of an employer’s books and records pursuant to Section 302(b)(20) of

ERISA. Annuity, Pension, Welfare, Training & Labor Mgmt.Cooperation Trust Funds of

the Int’l Union of Operating Eng’rs, 714 F. Supp.3d 167, 177 (E.D.N.Y. 2024). Courts

may also enforce a union’s contractual right to audit an employer’s books and records

under the LMRA. Id. at 180. In addition, the Court maintains discretion to compel a

party to produce documents requested pursuant to Rule 37(a)(3)(B)(iv) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure. See In re Fitch, Inc., 330 F.3d 104, 108 (2d Cir. 2003)

(Motions to compel are “entrusted to the sound discretion of the district court.”).

Accordingly, plaintiffs’ motion to compel disclosure of books and records, including

payroll and other financial records necessary to verify compliance with the CBA, for the

period from October 1, 2019 through the present for plaintiffs’ review and audit is

GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: Buffalo, New York

September 29, 2025

s/ H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr.

H. KENNETH SCHROEDER, JR.

United States Magistrate Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.