Opinion

Woods v. City of St. Louis, Missouri

Court
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 39.3%

a district court has the power to dismiss an action for the plaintiff's failure to comply with any court order

How later courts described this case

  • a district court has the power to dismiss an action for the plaintiff's failure to comply with any court order

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

EASTERN DIVISION

DEBORAH WOODS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 4:24-cv-00868-MTS

)

CITY OF ST. LOUIS, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 25, 2025, the Court determined that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, Doc.

[40], was subject to dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(ii). The Court gave forty-five days in which to file a Second Amended

Complaint that, addressing the deficiencies raised in the Memorandum and Order, would

“sufficiently state a claim for relief.” Doc. [53] at 13. The Court warned Plaintiff that

failure to comply “may result in dismissal of this action without further notice.” Id.

Plaintiff’s deadline to file an amended complaint was Monday, September 08, 2025, and

she has not sought additional time in which to comply.

Because the Court gave Plaintiff meaningful notice of what was expected, cautioned

her regarding the consequences of her failure to comply, and gave her a reasonable amount

of time in which to do so, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice due to

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this Court’s Order to amend her complaint and for her

failure to prosecute this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d

801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (a district court has the power to dismiss an action for the

plaintiff's failure to comply with any court order); Dudley v. Miles, 597 F. App’x 392 (8th

Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal without prejudice where self-represented

plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint despite being cautioned that dismissal could

result from failure to do so). The Court will enter a separate Order of Dismissal herewith.

Dated this 18th day of September 2025.

{uy T. SCHELP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.