Opinion

Brown v. State of Ohio

Court
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Filed
Sep 9, 2025
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

JAMES V. BROWN, : Case No. 1:25-cv-176

:

Plaintiff, :

: Judge Michael R. Barrett

vs. :

Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson

:

STATE OF OHIO, HIGHLAND :

COUNTY PROSECUTOR, ANEEKA :

COLLINS, et al., :

:

Defendants.

ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court are two Motions filed by Plaintiff. (Docs. 29, 30). The Court grants the

first and recommends denying the second.

First, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Electronic Filing Rights (Doc. 29). The “grant of

electronic filing privileges is a privilege granted to pro se litigants in the discretion of this Court.”

Needham v. Butler Cty. Jail, No. 1:19-cv-294, 2019 WL 5883643, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 12, 2019).

The Court GRANTS the Motion. Plaintiff may register for e-filing through PACER:

https://www.ohsd.uscourts.gov/sites/ohsd/files//E-File%20Registration%20-%20Pro%20Se.pdf.

However, Plaintiff is WARNED that the Court may revoke this permission at any time should

Plaintiff not conform filings to the Federal and Local Rules.

Plaintiff’s second motion is a Motion for Default Judgment. (Doc. 30). In it, he asks for a

default judgment against Jerry Oyer for not responding to the summons that was returned as

executed on August 7, 2025. (Doc. 20). However, the Undersigned allowed Plaintiff to serve

Jerry Oyer as an Interested Party for the purposes of discovery, not as a Defendant. (Docs. 12,

15). Even more, the current recommendation before the District Judge is that all claims against

Jerry Oyer be dismissed. (Doc. 12). Therefore, default judgment is not appropriate here.

Accordingly, the Undersigned RECOMMENDS Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment be

DENIED. However, given Plaintiff’s apparent concerns about receiving the discovery the Court

has allowed him to request from the Interested Parties in this case, the Court ORDERS a joint

status report from Plaintiff and the Interested Parties within fourteen (14) days on their progress.

The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this Order and Report and Recommendation on

Jerry Oyer at the service address identified by Plaintiff. (Doc. 16 at 3).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: September 9, 2025 s/ Kimberly A. Jolson

KIMBERLY A. JOLSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.