The opinion
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
BRETT NICHOLS, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. ) Case No. 1:25-CV-00040-ACL
)
FRANK BISIGNANO, )
Commissioner of Social Security, )
)
)
Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of Defendant’s final decision
denying Plaintiff’s application for benefits under the Social Security Act. Currently pending is
Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Reverse and Remand. (Doc. 16.)
In his motion, Defendant requests that the Court reverse the decision of the administrative
law judge (“ALJ”) and remand this action to Defendant pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §
405(g). Defendant states that, after careful review of the above-captioned case, agency counsel
determined that remand was necessary for further evaluation of Plaintiff’s claim. Defendant
indicates that, upon remand by this Court, the Commissioner will instruct the ALJ to further
consider the severity of Plaintiff’s impairments, including hand and shoulder impairments; assess
the impact Plaintiff’s impairments have on his residual functional capacity; reassess Plaintiff’s
past relevant work considering new rules set forth in Social Security Ruling 24-2p; offer Plaintiff
the opportunity for a new hearing; take any further actions necessary to complete the
administrative record; and issue a new decision.
Sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) states that “[t]he court shall have power to enter,
upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing
the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a
rehearing.” In order for the Court to properly remand a case to the Commissioner pursuant to
sentence four, the Court must enter an order either affirming, modifying, or reversing the
Commissioner’s decision. See Brown v. Barnhart, 282 F.3d 580, 581 (8th Cir. 2002).
The undersigned believes that it is appropriate to reverse and remand this case in order to
permit the Commissioner to take further action as requested in his motion.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Reverse and Remand
(Doc. 16) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and this
cause is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42
U.S.C. § 405(g) for those reasons set forth in this Memorandum and Order. A separate written
Judgment will be entered in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant.
/s/ Abbie Crites-Leoni
ABBIE CRITES-LEONI
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated this 8th day of September, 2025.