Opinion

(PC) Dugger v. United States

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Aug 18, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 38.8%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 TIMOTHY DUGGER, No. 2:23-cv-01057-DC-AC (PC)

12 Plaintiff,

13 v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., CERTAIN CLAIMS

15 Defendants. (ECF No. 7)

16

17 Plaintiff, a former federal inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action

18 under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

19 (1971), the Federal Tort Claims Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act,

20 and state law. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

21 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

22 On January 29, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein that

23 were served on Plaintiff and contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and

24 recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has not filed

25 objections to the findings and recommendations.

26 /////

27 /////

28 /////

1 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

2 || supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

3 | ORDERED that:

4 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 7) are ADOPTED in full;

5 2. Plaintiff's Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation Act claims against all

6 Defendants are dismissed without leave to amend;

7 3. Plaintiffs state law claims against Defendants Thompson, Bouleware, Brown, and

8 Allred are dismissed without leave to amend;

9 4. This case proceeds on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim for inadequate medical

10 care against Defendants Thompson, Bouleware, Brown, and Allred and on □□□□□□□□□□□

11 claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act against the United States of America; and

12 5. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial

13 proceedings.

14

15 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _ August 18, 2025 LY x

17 Dena Coggins

United States District Judge

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.