The opinion
USCA11 Case: 25-12646 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 08/14/2025 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 25-12646
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
FELISSA GRISSETT,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
GOOGLE,
Defendant-Appellee.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 1:25-cv-04260-MHC
____________________
USCA11 Case: 25-12646 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 08/14/2025 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 25-12646
Before BRANCH, GRANT, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
tion. The day after filing the complaint that initiated this action,
Felissa Grissett, pro se, filed a notice of appeal. The district court
had not yet entered any order. The notice appears to complain of
the assigned district judge and of Grissett’s lack of e-filing access.
The court later entered an order and judgment dismissing the ac-
tion.
We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of
appeal was filed before the district court entered or announced the
final order and judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (providing that ap-
pellate jurisdiction is generally limited to final decisions of the dis-
trict courts); Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B) (providing that a notice of
appeal must designate the judgment or appealable order from
which the appeal is taken); Bogle v. Orange Cnty. Bd. of Cnty.
Comm’rs, 162 F.3d 653, 661 (11th Cir. 1998) (explaining that a notice
of appeal is ineffective to appeal a contemplated future order or
judgment that does not exist at the time the notice of appeal is filed,
unless the decision or order was already announced).
All pending motions are DENIED as moot.