Opinion

Lang v. Brown County Detention Center

Court
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Filed
Aug 13, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 38.7%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

JAMES H. LANG, : Case No. 1:25-cv-511

:

Plaintiff, :

: District Judge Susan J. Dlott

vs. :

Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr.

:

BROWN COUNTY DETENTION :

CENTER, :

:

Defendant. :

DEFICIENCY ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner at the Brown County Detention Center, has filed a motion for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis in connection with a prisoner civil rights complaint. (Doc. 1).

However, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is incomplete. The

“Certificate” page of Plaintiff’s application (page 8 of the Application and Affidavit By

Incarcerated Person to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees form) has not been completed and

signed by the institutional cashier (see Doc. 1, PageID 8), and Plaintiff has failed to provide the

Court with a certified copy of his trust fund account statement as required by the Prison Litigation

Reform Act (PLRA) of 1995, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)-(h).

Pursuant to the PLRA, a prisoner seeking to bring a civil action without prepayment of fees

or security therefor must submit an application and affidavit to proceed without prepayment of

fees and a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the

six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint obtained from the cashier of

the prison at which the prisoner is or was confined. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff must pay $405 ($350 filing fee plus $55

administrative fee) or submit to the Court a completed in forma pauperis application and certified

copy of his prison trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the preceding six-

month period within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.

If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court shall dismiss his case for want of

prosecution. In re Prison Litigation Reform Act, 105 F.3d 1131 (6th Cir. 1997). If Plaintiff’s case

is dismissed for failure to comply with this Order, the case will not be reinstated to the Court’s

active docket despite the payment of the filing fee. Id. Should Plaintiff need additional time to

comply with this Order, he must file a motion for extension of time.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff an Application and Affidavit By

Incarcerated Person to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees form and to send a copy of this Order

to the cashier of the prison at which Plaintiff is confined.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

August 13, 2025 s/Peter B. Silvain, Jr.

Peter B. Silvain, Jr.

United States Magistrate Judge

1To the extent plaintiff has indicated difficulty in getting this information (see Doc. 1, PageID 8), a copy of this

Deficiency Order is being sent to the cashier of the prison at which plaintiff is confined.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.