The opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHARLES T. DIEHL, No. 4:25-CV-00019
Petitioner, (Chief Judge Brann)
v.
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD,
Respondent.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 11th day of August 2025, in accordance with the
accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner Charles T. Diehl’s motion to supplement (Doc. 17) is
GRANTED only to the extent that the Court will consider Diehl’s
Supplemental Memorandum (Doc. 17-2).
2. Diehl’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
2254 is DENIED.
3. A certificate of appealability shall not issue, as Diehl has not made a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), or that “jurists of reason would find it debatable”
whether this Court’s procedural rulings are correct, Slack v.
McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
Chief United States District Judge