Opinion

Brown v. Lauderdale County

Court
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Filed
Aug 11, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 38.7%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI

NORTHERN DIVISION

DECAMRON BROWN PETITIONER

vs. CIVIL ACTION No.: 3:24-CV-487-HTW-LGI

LAUDERDALE COUNTY and SHERIFF

WARD CALHOUN RESPONDENTS

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

BEFORE THIS COURT is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

Judge LaKeysha Greer Isaac, filed in the above-captioned matter on May 21, 2025. ECF No. 12.

Magistrate Judge Isaac carefully considered the submissions of the parties, the record, and relevant

law, and crafted a sound Report and Recommendation. Magistrate Judge Isaac recommended that

this Court grant Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9) and deny this Petition for Habeas

Corpus (pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241) on the merits. Magistrate Judge Isaac directed the parties

to file any objections within fourteen (14) days. Neither party has filed an objection to date, and

the time to do so has expired.1

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Isaac’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.

12) hereby is ADOPTED; Respondents’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 9) is GRANTED; and this

1 “[A] party’s failure to file written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and

recommendation in a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation … after being served with a

copy shall bar that party, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal the

unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court,

provided that the party has been served with notice that such consequences will result from a failure

to object.” Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428–29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc),

superseded by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Magistrate Judge Isaac’s Report

and Recommendation explicitly warned Petitioner of the Douglass rule.

Petition is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This Court, separately, will enter

a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 11th day of August , 2025.

/s/HENRY T. WINGATE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.