Opinion

Pugh v. Clarke County, Alabama(MAG+)

Court
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Filed
Jun 17, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 36.6%

The opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DEVIN BRANDIS PUGH, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:25cv27-MHT

) (WO)

CLARKE COUNTY, ALABAMA, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

This cause is now before the court on what the

clerk’s office has docketed as plaintiff's notice of

interlocutory appeal (Doc. 35). It is not clear to the

court that plaintiff intended to file a notice of

interlocutory appeal. It appears that he may have

intended to file a notice of appeal as to only those

cases of his that have already been dismissed. See

Notice (Doc. 35) at 1, 3, and 4.* However, to the

extent that plaintiff intended an interlocutory appeal

* As to his still-pending cases, such as this one,

plaintiff makes an objection to the recommendation of

the magistrate judge. See id. at 5.

of this case, the court treats his appeal notice as

containing a motion to proceed on appeal in forma

pauperis.

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) provides that, “An appeal may

not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court

certifies in writing that it is not taken in good

faith.” In making this determination as to good faith,

a court must use an objective standard, such as whether

the appeal is “frivolous,” Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962), or “has no substantive

merit.” United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176

(5th Cir. Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam); see also

Rudolph v. Allen, 666 F.2d 519, 520 (11th Cir. 1982)

(per curiam); Morris v. Ross, 663 F.2d 1032 (11th Cir.

1981). Applying this standard, this court is of the

opinion that the plaintiff's interlocutory appeal is

without a legal or factual basis and, accordingly, is

frivolous and not taken in good faith. See, e.g.,

Rudolph v. Allen, supra; Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp.

2

1382 (S.D. Fla. 1977), aff'd without opinion, 589 F.2d

1113 (5th Cir. 1979).

***

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff's

motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is

denied; and that the appeal in this cause is certified,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), as not taken in good

faith.

DONE, this the 17th day of June, 2025.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.