Opinion

Ameen Olwan v. Arkansas Tobacco Control Board

  • 2020 Ark. App. 201
Court
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Filed
Mar 18, 2020
Status
Published
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 59.9%

dismissing appeal of circuit court’s order remanding for two new hearings as not final

How later courts described this case

  • dismissing appeal of circuit court’s order remanding for two new hearings as not final

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 201

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION IV

No. CV-19-328

Opinion Delivered: March 18, 2020

AMEEN OLWAN ET AL.

APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY

CIRCUIT COURT,

V. SECOND DIVISION

[NO. 60CV-17-6533]

ARKANSAS TOBACCO CONTROL

BOARD HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER

APPELLEE CHARLES PIAZZA, JUDGE

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge

The Arkansas Tobacco Control Board (Board) revoked appellant Ameen Olwan’s

permits to sell tobacco products after finding that he “was in possession of . . . tobacco

products with unpaid [excise] taxes, and he purchased tobacco, vapor, or alternative

nicotine products from unlicensed dealers.” Following Olwan’s petition for judicial review

of the administrative adjudication as permitted under Arkansas Code Annotated section

25-15-212 (Supp. 2019), the Pulaski County Circuit Court remanded the case to the Board

for new hearings. Olwan appeals the circuit court’s order of remand; however, because he

appeals from a nonfinal order, we must dismiss the appeal.

On December 18, 2018, the circuit court entered an order that states the following:

This case is remanded to the Arkansas Tobacco Control Board for two new

hearings; the first is to decide whether revocation of Petitioner’s tobacco permits

was proper and the second to rehear Arkansas Tobacco Control Case Number

2016-0227.

A circuit court’s order of remand to an administrative agency for further

proceedings is not a final, appealable order.1 Because the order is not final, we lack

jurisdiction to hear the present appeal.

Dismissed without prejudice.

KLAPPENBACH and VAUGHT, JJ., agree.

Hancock Law Firm, by: Charles D. Hancock, for appellant.

Lyndsey D. Burnette, Arkansas Tobacco Control, for appellee.

1

Ark. Ins. Dep’t v. Henley, 2016 Ark. App. 60, 481 S.W.3d 467.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.