The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 KYLE MIHOLICH, individually and on Case No.: 24-cv-01038-AGS-JLB
behalf of all others similarly situated,
12
ORDER GRANTING NON-PARTY
Plaintiff,
13 LOFTY, INC.’S MOTION TO FILE
v. DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
14
PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79.2
THE REAL BROKERAGE, INC., et al.,
15
Defendants. [ECF No. 77]
16
17
18
19 Before the Court is a Motion to File Documents Under Seal Pursuant to Local Rule
20 79.2 (“Motion to Seal”) filed by non-party Lofty, Inc. (“Lofty”). (ECF No. 77.) Lofty
21 requests leave to file under seal certain documents submitted in connection with its
22 Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. (ECF No. 52.) Given the confidential
23 business information included in the documents, the Court finds that Lofty has established
24 good cause for sealing. Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu , 447 F.3d 1172, 1179
25 (9th Cir. 2006). Good cause appearing, Lofty’s Motion to Seal is GRANTED.
26 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to file under seal the unredacted versions
27 of the following:
28 1. Lofty’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 78, Ex. 1);
l 2. Exhibits A and B attached to the Declaration of Nicole Romero in support
2 || of Lofty’s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 79, Ex. 2); and
3 3. Declaration of Garland Brown in support of Lofty’s Opposition to
4 || Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 80, Ex. 3).
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 ||Dated: June 11, 2025 -
n. Jill L. Burkhardt
8 ited States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28