The opinion
Diaz v Insite Prop. Group LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 32010(U)
June 6, 2025
Supreme Court, New York County
Docket Number: Index No. 157189/2020
Judge: Mary V. Rosado
Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York
State and local government sources, including the New
York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service.
This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official
publication.
INDEX NO. 157189/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 113 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/06/2025
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
NEW YORK COUNTY
PRESENT: HON. MARY V. ROSADO PART 33M
Justice
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
INDEX NO. 157189/2020
RONY FRANKLIN POSAS DIAZ,
MOTION DATE 01/18/2024
Plaintiff,
MOTION SEQ. NO. 005
- V -
INSITE PROPERTY GROUP LLC,P.B. BROWN,
LLC,HEMUNINU CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS DECISION + ORDER ON
LLC,ELLIS STORAGE LLC, MOTION
Defendant.
----------------X
INSITE PROPERTY GROUP LLC, P.B. BROWN, LLC, ELLIS Third-Party
STORAGE LLC Index No. 595836/2021
Plaintiff,
-against-
HEMUNINU CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant.
-----------------------------------------X
INSITE PROPERTY GROUP LLC, P.B. BROWN, LLC, ELLIS Second Third-Party
STORAGE LLC Index No. 595057/2023
Plaintiff,
-against-
ISLAND REDI-MIX, INC., KG CONCRETE PUMPING CORP.
Defendant.
--------------------------- ---------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 005) 84, 85, 86, 87, 88,
89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 98, 99,100,101,102,103, 104, 105,106,107,108, 109, 110, 111
were read on this motion to/for SUMMARY JUDGMENT(AFTER JOINDER
Upon the foregoing documents, and after a final submission date of April 22, 2025,
Plaintiff Rony Franklin Posas Diaz's ("Plaintiff') motion for partial summary judgment on the
157189/2020 POSAS DIAZ, RONY FRANKLIN vs. INSITE PROPERTY GROUP LLC Page 1 of 4
Motion No. 005
[* 1] 1 of 4
INDEX NO. 157189/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 113 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/06/2025
issue of liability on his Labor Law§ 240(1) claim against Defendants P.B. Brown, LLC ("P.B.
Brown") and Ellis Storage LLC ("Ellis") (collectively "Defendants") is denied. 1
I. Background
On August 12, 2020, Plaintiff was working for Defendant/Third-Party Defendant Hemiunu
Construction Solutions, LLC ("Hemiunu") at a construction site at 1 Ellis Street, Staten Island,
New York (the "Premises") when the concrete pump hose he was holding exploded and caused
him to fall sixteen feet from the top of a seawall (NYSCEF Doc. 90 at 9-12; 16; 32; 50-51). Ellis
owned the Premises and P.B. Brown was the general contractor (NYSCEF Doc. 92 at 9; see also
NYSCEF Doc. 93). Hemiunu was contracted to build a seawall at the Premises to conform with
the Department of Building's post-Hurricane Sandy requirements (NYSCEF Doc. 104 at 24).
Plaintiff was filling concrete into the seawall being formed when the concrete hose he was holding
exploded and threw him to the ground. Plaintiff now moves for summary judgment on his Labor
Law§ 240(1) claim and Defendants oppose.
II. Discussion
"Summary judgment is a drastic remedy, to be granted only where the moving party has
tendered sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact." (Vega v
Restani Const. Corp., 18 NY3d 499, 503 [2012]). The moving party's "burden is a heavy one and
on a motion for summary judgment, facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-
moving party." (Jacobsen v New York City Health and Hasps. Corp., 22 NY3d 824, 833 [2014]).
Once this showing is made, the burden shifts to the party opposing the motion to produce
evidentiary proof, in admissible form, sufficient to establish the existence of material issues of fact
which require a trial (See e.g., Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]).
1
A stipulation of discontinuance was executed as to Defendant Insite Property Group, LLC, and Defendant/Third-
Party Defendant Hemiunu is in default.
157189/2020 POSAS DIAZ, RONY FRANKLIN vs. lNSITE PROPERTY GROUP LLC Page 2 of 4
Motion No. 005
[* 2] 2 of 4
INDEX NO. 157189/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 113 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/06/2025
Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the non-movant, the Defendants, the Court
finds there are issues of fact which preclude granting summary judgment. There is conflicting
testimony and inconclusive photographic evidence as to whether scaffolding was present at the
time and location of Plaintiff's accident. While Plaintiff testified there were no scaffolds on the
day of his accident (NYSCEF Doc. 90 at 31), Mr. Gonzalez testified that there was scaffolding on
the backside of the wall where Plaintiff fell (NYSCEF Doc. 92 at 11 ). Guy Saccento, another
witness for P.B. Brown, testified there was scaffolding erected around the entire retaining wall
(NYSCEF Doc. 104 at 26). Plaintiff's counsel argues that even if scaffolding was present this does
not mean he could tie his harness off to the scaffolding. However, this contradicts Plaintiff's own
testimony that he used the scaffold to secure his harness (NYSCEF Doc. 90 at 24). The conflicting
testimony about the availability of an adequate safety device creates an issue of fact which cannot
be resolved on summary judgment (Fundus v Scarola, 214 AD3d 479, 479-80 [1st Dept 2023];
Albino v 221-223 West 82 Owners Corp., 142 AD3d 799, 800 [1st Dept 2016]; Moracho v Open
Door Family Medical Center, Inc., 74 AD3d 657. 658 [1st Dept 2010]).
There are further issues of fact as to whether any safety device could have protected
Plaintiff from falling from the force of an exploding cement hose (see Valle v Port Auth. of NY
& NJ, 189 AD3d 594, 595 [1st Dept 2020] citing Morera v New York City Tr. Auth., 182 AD3d
509 [1st Dept 2020]). Plaintiff testified the person who was handling the flow of concrete from the
truck to the hose "was being trained" and when the concrete started flowing from the truck to
Plaintiff's hose, "before one minute had passed ... the hose exploded" and "hit [his] head ... and
threw [him] down" (NYSCEF Doc. 90 at 49-51 ).
Based on the record before the Court, there is an issue of fact as to whether the negligence
of the individual operating the concrete pump was the cause of Plaintiff's accident, and whether
157189/2020 POSAS DIAZ, RONY FRANKLIN vs. INSITE PROPERTY GROUP LLC Page 3 of 4
Motion No. 005
3 of 4
[* 3]
INDEX NO. 157189/2020
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 113 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/06/2025
any safety device could have prevented Plaintiff from falling when confronted with the force of an
exploding concrete hose (see also Hajderlli v Wiljohn 59 LLC, 71 AD3d 416, 416-17 [1st Dept
201 O]). Therefore, Plaintiffs motion is denied.
Accordingly, it is hereby,
ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability
with respect to his Labor Law § 240(1) claim is denied; and it is further
ORDERED that within ten days of entry, counsel for Defendants shall serve a copy of this
Decision and Order, with notice of entry, on all parties via NYSCEF.
This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.
HON. ARY V. ROSADO, J.S.C.
CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
GRANTED 0 DENIED GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER
APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE
157189/2020 POSAS DIAZ, RONY FRANKLIN vs. INSITE PROPERTY GROUP LLC Page 4 of 4
Motion No. 005
4 of 4
[* 4]