Opinion

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court
United States Court of Federal Claims
Filed
Jun 5, 2025
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Brian H. Corcoran
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 23-1970V

PATRICK BROWN,

Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner,

v. Filed: May 6, 2025

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Jubaile Abila, Groth Law Firm, S.C., Brookfield, WI, for Petitioner.

Ryan Nelson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1

On November 9, 2023, Patrick Brown filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration resulting from an influenza vaccine he received on November 19, 2020.

Petition, ECF No. 1. On October 30, 2024, I issued a decision awarding compensation to

Petitioner based on the Respondent’s proffer. ECF No. 27.

1

Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at

https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of

2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government

Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In

accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other

inf ormation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If , upon review, I

agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material f rom public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section ref erences to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2018).

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award

of $18,796.54 (representing $18,190.40 in fees plus $606.14 in costs). Application for

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Motion”) filed January 31, 2025, ECF No. 33. Furthermore,

Petitioner filed a signed statement representing that Petitioner incurred no personal out-

of-pocket expenses. Id. at 23.

Respondent reacted to the motion on February 5, 2025, indicating that he is

satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in

this case but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. Motion

at 2-4, ECF No. 34. Petitioner filed no reply thereafter.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my

experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested

hours or rates. Furthermore, Petitioner has provided supporting documentation for all

claimed costs. ECF No. 33 at 11-22. Respondent offered no specific objection to the rates

or amounts sought. I find the requested costs reasonable and hereby award them in full.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for

successful claimants. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for

attorney’s fees and costs. Petitioner is awarded attorneys’ fees and costs in the total

amount of $18,796.54 (representing $18,190.40 in fees plus $606.14 in costs) to be

paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt

disbursement. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the

Rules of the Court), the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this

decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

3

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by f iling a joint notice

renouncing their right to seek review.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.