Opinion

YOUNG v. LITTLE

Court
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
May 28, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.9%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LATIEF YOUNG, et al., )

Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:23 -ev-358

Vv. )

)

GEORGE M. LITTLE, et al. )

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This pro se civil action was commenced on December 18, 2023 by Plaintiffs Latief

Young and Eric Coxry, on behalf of themselves and all inmates at the State Correctional

Institution at Forest (“SCI-Forest”). ECF Nos. 1, 11. Plaintiffs have sued George M. Little,

Laurel R. Harry, Ian Gustafson, S. Shaffer, and the Department of Corrections, alleging

constitutional violations related to the conditions of confinement at SCI-Forest. ECF No. 11. O

October 16, 2024, Plaintiff Young filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, which remains

pending before the Court. ECF No. 26.

The case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Christopher B. Brown for

pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), and

Local Civil Rule 72. On May 2, 2025, Judge Brown issued a report and recommendation

(“R&R”) in which he opined that the claims asserted by Young should be dismissed based on

Young’s failure to prosecute this case. ECF No. [52]. After considering the various factors set

forth in Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984), Judge

Brown concluded that, on balance, the relevant factors weighed in favor of dismissal as a

punitive sanction. Judge Brown also recommends that this Court dismiss Young’s motion for a

preliminary injunction as moot. Because Plaintiff Coxry has been actively prosecuting his

claims, Judge Brown noted that his recommendation for dismissal pertains only to Young.

Objections to the R&R were due on or before May 22, 2025. To date, no objections have

been received.

Accordingly, after de novo review of the Complaint and documents in the case, including

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. [52],

IT IS ORDERED, this 28th day of May, 2025, that pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, the claims asserted by Plaintiff Latief Young shall be, and hereby are,

DISMISSED with prejudice, based on Plaintiff Young’s failure to prosecute his case. The case

shall proceed as to Plaintiff Eric Coxry.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge issued on May 2, 2025, ECF No. [52], is adopted as the Opinion of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff Young’s motion for a preliminary

injunction, ECF No. [26], is DISMISSED as moot.

Near i Ap FF Cet fb AAS CTP

Susan Paradise Baxter

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.