Opinion

William Sims v. State of Florida

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
May 21, 2025
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.5%

The opinion

Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 21, 2025.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D25-0228

Lower Tribunal No. F95-33413

________________

William Sims,

Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Richard

Hersch, Judge.

William Sims, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

GORDO, J.

William Sims (“Sims”), pro se, appeals the trial court’s January 21,

2025, order denying his motion to compel the Office of the Public Defender

to provide him with the record on appeal, including all trial and deposition

transcripts related to the direct appeal of his 1995 felony case. The trial court

denied Sims’ motion to compel, referencing a response from the Office of the

Public Defender that it was not in possession of the requested documents.

Because the response from the Office of the Public Defender refuted Sims’

allegation that it possessed the documents which Sims is entitled to have,1

the trial court was within its authority to deny the motion. We therefore affirm

without prejudice to Sims seeking to obtain the requested documents from

other agencies that may possess them, i.e., the clerk’s office or the State

Attorney’s Office. See Brown v. State, 152 So. 3d 739, 741 (Fla. 4th DCA

2014) (“We reverse because the response of the Office of the Public

Defender did not refute Brown’s allegation that his attorneys possessed the

documents . . . As it stands, this is not a case where there is no contested

issue of fact. On remand, if the Office of the Public Defender produces

evidence that it does not in fact possess the documents which Brown is

1

“Transcripts or record documents that were prepared at public expense on

behalf of an indigent defendant must be provided to the defendant without

charge for copying.” Brown v. State, 93 So. 3d 1194, 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA

2012).

2

entitled to have, the petition should be denied without prejudice to Brown

seeking to obtain them from other agencies that may possess them, i.e., the

clerk’s office or state attorney’s office.”).

Affirmed.

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.