Opinion

Isenberg v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole

Court
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
May 20, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.5%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RONALD K. ISENBERG, JR., No. 4:24-CV-01662

Petitioner, (Chief Judge Brann)

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF

PAROLE, et al.,

Respondents.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 20th day of May 2025, in accordance with the

accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner Ronald K. Isenberg, Jr.’s petition for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED.

2. A certificate of appealability shall not issue, as Isenberg has not made

a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), or that “jurists of reason would find it debatable”

whether this Court’s procedural rulings are correct, Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

3. In light of the foregoing paragraphs, Isenberg’s motion (Doc. 11) to

appoint counsel is DENIED.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Matthew W. Brann

Matthew W. Brann

Chief United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.