Opinion

MCMILLIAN, LANELL v. ULG COMPANIES, LLC

  • 2025 TN WC 25
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
May 12, 2025
Status
Published
On the bench
Addington
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.3%

The opinion

FILED

May 12, 2025

12:03 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT GRAY

LANELL MCMILLIAN, ) Docket Number: 2021-02-0554

Employee, )

v. )

ULG COMPANIES, LLC, )

Employer, ) State File Number: 81115-2021

And )

UNITED WISCONSIN INSURANCE )

COMPANY, )

Carrier. ) Judge Brian K. Addington

COMPENSATION ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Mr. McMillian filed a request under the open medical provisions of a Compensation

Order seeking payment of past unauthorized medical bills, current medical treatment, and

settlement of his open medical benefits. ULG Companies, LLC filed a motion for summary

judgment, which the Court heard on May 2. Mr. McMillian did not appear.

The issue is whether Mr. McMillian can present sufficient evidence that his current

need for medical treatment is primarily related to his September 18, 2021, work injury. For

the reasons below, the Court holds Mr. McMillian did not present the necessary evidence

and ULG is entitled to summary judgment.

Claim History

On September 18, 2021, Mr. McMillian suffered a left-leg injury that arose

primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment.

In April 2024, this Court entered a Compensation Order denying Mr. McMillian

permanent disability benefits but awarding “reasonable and necessary medical benefits for

[his] work-related left-ankle sprain under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204.”

1

In October 2024, Mr. McMillian filed a Motion to Compel seeking reimbursement

of unauthorized medical bills, medical treatment, and settlement of his open medical

benefits. The parties mediated unsuccessfully.

After issuance of a dispute certification notice, the Court set scheduling deadlines,

including deadlines for filing dispositive motions and the date for a compensation hearing

on the record.

Later, ULG filed a Motion for Summary Judgment with a statement of undisputed

material facts with citations to the record in compliance with Rule 56.03 of the Tennessee

Rules of Civil Procedure.

The statement of undisputed material facts included:

1. Mr. McMillian injured his left-lower extremity on September 18, 2021, while

working for ULG.

2. Mr. McMillian received authorized treatment for his left-lower extremity

injuries from Dr. Paul Kerner.

3. Dr. Kerner diagnosed Mr. McMillian with a left-ankle sprain.

4. Dr. Kerner placed Mr. McMillian at maximum medical improvement without

any permanent physical impairment on July 19, 2022.

5. Dr. Kerner concluded that any additional treatment is less than 50% related

to the September 2021 work injury.

Mr. McMillian filed a response disputing some of the above facts, but he did not

cite to the record or supply affidavits from any medical providers. He offered medical

records, unauthorized medical bills, and a C-32 signed by Edwin Newman; however, he

did not include a curriculum vitae showing Mr. Newman’s credentials.

Law and Analysis

Mr. McMillian submitted unauthorized medical bills that he wants ULG to pay. He

incurred these unauthorized medical bills before the 2024 Order for Summary Judgment.

This claim is barred by res judicata.

The Supreme Court held that “res judicata, also referred to as claim preclusion, bars

a second suit between the same parties on the same cause of action with respect to all issues

that . . . could have been litigated in the former suit.” Creech v. Addington, 281 S.W.2d

363, 376 (Tenn. 2009).

The Court considers its 2024 award of summary judgment as a full and final

disposition of benefits sought by Mr. McMillian except for his right to future medical

treatment of his left-ankle sprain. In Harrogate Corp. v. Systems Sales Corp., 915 S.W.2d

2

812, 816 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995), the Court held, “[s]ummary judgment resolves the [issues]

treated on their merits and is a final judgment for the purposes of res judicata.” The Court

considers Mr. McMillian’s claim for payment of medical services incurred before the 2024

summary judgment order ended on the date of that order.

As to Mr. McMillian’s request for medical treatment, summary judgment is proper

“if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together

with the affidavits, if any, show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that

the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.04

(2024).

ULG must do one of two things to prevail on its motion: (1) submit affirmative

evidence that negates an essential element of the other party’s claim, or (2) demonstrate

that the evidence is insufficient to establish an essential element of the claim. Tenn. Code

Ann. § 20-16-101 (2024); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477

S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015).

If ULG does either or both, Mr. McMillian must respond by producing specific facts

showing a genuine issue for trial. Id.; Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.06. If Mr. McMillian does not,

then “summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be entered against [him].” Id.

Here, ULG submitted evidence from Dr. Kerner stating Mr. McMillian’s current

need for medical treatment is not primarily related to his work injury. Thus, Mr. McMillian

must present evidence showing a genuine issue for trial. He did not do so. He did not submit

a properly completed C-32 or affidavits from medical providers showing that he needs

treatment primarily caused by his work injury.

Based on these facts, ULG successfully showed that Mr. McMillian’s evidence is

insufficient to establish medical causation, which is an essential element of his claim.

Therefore, no genuine issue of material fact exists regarding the question of causation, and

the Court holds ULG is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.

Finally, the Court cannot order ULG to pay Mr. McMillian to close his right to

future medical benefits under the Tennessee Workers’ Compensation Law. Section 50-6-

240(d) delegates “compromising and settling” future medical benefits solely among

parties. Therefore, the Court denies Mr. McMillian’s request.

Given this ruling, ULG’s recently filed motions are moot, and the scheduled

compensation hearing on the record is canceled.

3

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. The Court denies Mr. McMillan’s request for payment of past unauthorized medical

expenses.

2. The Court denies Mr. McMillan’s request to require ULG to settle his right to future

medical benefits.

3. ULG is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law on the issue of Mr.

McMillian’s request for current medical treatment.

4. The Court taxes the $150.00 filing fee to ULG under Tennessee Compilation Rules

and Regulations 0800-02-21-06 (2023) payable to the Clerk within five business

days.

5. Unless appealed, this Order shall become final 30 days after entry.

ENTERED May 12, 2025.

Brian K. Addington

______________________________________

JUDGE BRIAN K. ADDINGTON

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent on May 12, 2025.

Name Mail Email Service sent to:

Lanell McMillian, X lannellmcm27@gmail.com

Employee

Allen Grant, X agrant@eraclides.com

Ben Norris, X bnorris@eraclides.com

Employer’s Attorneys

______________________________________

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

4

Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation

Appeals Board. To do so, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.

¾ If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the

order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed

within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed.

¾ If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues

in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of

the date the Compensation Order was filed.

When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney,

if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar

days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office

or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an

Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office)

seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency

within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing

fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. If no court

reporter was present at the hearing, you may request from the Court Clerk the audio

recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If you choose to submit a transcript as part of your

appeal, which the Appeals Board has emphasized is important for a meaningful review of

the case, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript, and you must file it with the

Court Clerk. The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board,

and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. For deadlines related to the filing of

transcripts, statements of the evidence, and briefs on appeal, see the applicable rules on the

Bureau’s website at https://www.tn.gov/wcappealsboard. (Click the “Read Rules” button.)

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the Court Order

becomes enforceable. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(3) (expedited/interlocutory

orders) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7) (compensation orders).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board;ĐŚĞĐŬŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞďŽdžĞƐĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞĚĂƚĞĨŝůĞͲ

ƐƚĂŵƉĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĨŝƌƐƚƉĂŐĞŽĨƚŚĞŽƌĚĞƌ;ƐͿďĞŝŶŐĂƉƉĞĂůĞĚͿ͗

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________

□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.