Opinion

Doe v. Reynoldsburg City School District Board of Education

Court
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Filed
May 7, 2025
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

JOHN DOE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 2:25-cv-138

Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

REYNOLDSBURG CITY SCHOOL Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Greg Pollock

and the Reynoldsburg City School District Board of Education. (ECF No. 5.) In response to the

Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint against all Defendants. (ECF No. 8.)

Amended complaints supersede the original pleadings and render pending motions to

dismiss moot. Lloyd v. Pokorny, No. 2:20-cv-2928, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123212, at *6 (S.D.

Ohio July 7, 2020) (explaining that after a plaintiff subsequently files an amended complaint,

courts in this Circuit will deny a motion filed under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

as moot). Because Plaintiffs filed the Amended Complaint after the Motion to Dismiss, the

Amended Complaint superseded the original complaint and the pending Motion to Dismiss

became moot. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as MOOT. (ECF No. 5.)

This case remains open.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5/7/2025 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.