Opinion

Smith v. Smith

  • 406 So. 2d 71
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Nov 18, 1981
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 82.8%

reservation of alimony should be made in light of fact that wife had undergone surgery for cancer and although wife did not have cancer at time of divorce, there was significant risk of the disease recurring at a later date

How later courts described this case

  • reservation of alimony should be made in light of fact that wife had undergone surgery for cancer and although wife did not have cancer at time of divorce, there was significant risk of the disease recurring at a later date

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

406 So.2d 71 (1981)

Arthur Vernon SMITH, Appellant,

v.

Jacqueline Tessier SMITH, Appellee.

No. 80-2197.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 18, 1981.

James A. Helinger, Jr., Clearwater, for appellant.

Thomas Saieva of Woodworth & Saieva, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of dissolution is affirmed except in one minor particular. Among other directives the court ordered the payment of rehabilitative alimony to the wife for a period of two years. If at the end of the two years the husband has fully complied with this obligation the court will lose jurisdiction to make any further award of alimony. Brown v. Brown, 338 So.2d 916 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). The record in this case reflects that the wife had undergone surgery *72 for cancer. Her physician testified that while she does not now have cancer, there is a significant risk of the disease recurring at a later date. Under these circumstances we hereby amend the final judgment to include a reservation of jurisdiction which will permit the court at any future time to award additional alimony which may be dictated by changes in the circumstances of the parties. Greene v. Greene, 256 So.2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Melton v. Melton, 251 So.2d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971).

HOBSON, A.C.J., and GRIMES and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.