Opinion

Ashford v. Google, Inc

Court
District Court, S.D. California
Filed
Apr 29, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.0%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 BURK N. ASHFORD, Case No.: 25-cv-0327-BJC-AHG

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

13 v. TO TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS [ECF NO. 7]

14 GOOGLE, et al,

15 Defendants.

16

17

18 On February 12, 2025, Plaintiff Burk N. Ashford filed a Petition for Preliminary

19 Injunction alleging Defendants Google and Yahoo have locked him out of his personal

20 email accounts, and he seeks “unfettered access to his email accounts from wherever he

21 may be.” [ECF No. 1.] Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

22 (“IFP”) which the Court denied on February 19, 2025. [ECF Nos. 3, 4.]

23 Plaintiff has filed a Renewed Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

24 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). [ECF No. 7.] For the reasons stated below, his motion is

25 GRANTED.

26 Generally, all parties instituting a civil action in this court must pay a filing fee. See

27 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Civ.L.R. 4.5(a). However, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the court

28 may authorize the commencement, prosecution, or defense of any suit without payment

| ||of fees if the plaintiff submits an affidavit, including a statement of all his or her assets,

2 || showing that he or she is unable to pay filing fees or costs. “An affidavit in support of an

3 || IFP application is sufficient where it alleges that the affiant cannot pay the court costs and

4 ||still afford the necessities of life.” Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir.

5 ||2015). “[A] plaintiff seeking IFP status must allege poverty with some particularity,

6 || definiteness and certainty.” /d. (internal quotation marks omitted). The granting or denial

7 ||of leave to proceed IFP in civil cases is within the sound discretion of the district court.

8 || Venerable v. Meyers, 500 F.2d 1215, 1216 (9th Cir. 1974) (citations omitted).

9 In his application, Plaintiff states that he receives $1,310 in monthly income from

10 }/‘“Pension, annuity, or life insurance payments.” [ECF No. 7 at 4.] Plaintiff states his

11 ||/monthly expenses include $600 rent, $35 telephone, and that his utilities and medical co-

12 || pays vary. [/d. at 5.] Plaintiff states he has $97.39 in his Chase account. [/d. at 7.] Although

13 ||he does not provide an accurate accounting of his monthly expenses, Plaintiff's income

14 || and bank account indicate that he does not have funds to pay the filing fee and still “afford

15 necessities of life.” Escobedo, 787 F.3d at 1234. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS

16 || Plaintiff’?s IFP Motion [ECF No. 7.]

17 IT IS SO ORDERED.

18 ||Dated: April 29, 2025

19

20 6 oq Gan CG Lh fu

21

29 Honorable Benjamin J. Cheeks

United States District Judge

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.