Opinion

Brown v. Chavis

Court
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Filed
Apr 1, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 34.7%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

SHREVEPORT DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER BROWN CIVIL ACTION NO. 24-1522

SECTION P

VS.

JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.

ROBERT CHAVIS, ET AL. MAG. JUDGE KAYLA D. MCCLUSKY

NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISMISS

On January 8, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff Christopher Brown to, within thirty days,

give the Clerk of Court two (2) completed summonses and one (1) completed USM-285 form for

each defendant for service. [doc. # 10]. To date, however, Plaintiff has not complied.

Plaintiffs inaction is grounds for dismissal of this proceeding against the unserved

defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Court, under its inherent power to

control the docket, may dismiss an action sua sponte.!

Plaintiff is advised that within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Notice and in the

absence of good cause shown, the Court intends to dismiss the defendants for whom Plaintiff has

failed to complete and return the required service documents. FED. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

The Clerk of Court shall attach copies of Documents 10, 10-1, and 10-2 to this Notice.

In Chambers, Monroe, Louisiana, this 1“ day of April, 2025.

Toyf Ky Me bus by

AYLA DYE MCCLUSKY

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

' See Link v. Wabash Railroad Company, 82 S. Ct. 1386 (1962); Rogers v. Kroger, Co., 669 F.2d

317, 320-21 (Sth Cir. 1982); Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Energy Gathering, Inc. 2 F.3d 1397,

1407 (Sth Cir. 1993).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.