Opinion

Brown v. World Health Organization

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Mar 19, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 34.5%

holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue

How later courts described this case

  • holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SHARON BROWN,

Plaintiff,

24-CV-7216 (LTS)

-against-

ORDER

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, et al.,

Defendants.

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:

By order dated March 7, 2025, the Court dismissed this action for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment. On March 13, 2025, before

judgment was entered in this case, Plaintiff filed her third request for preliminary injunctive

relief. Five days later, on March 18, 2025, a civil judgment was entered. Accordingly, the Court

directs the Clerk of Court to terminate Plaintiff’s request for relief. (ECF 12.)

This case is closed.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would

not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an

appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant

demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 19, 2025

New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

Chief United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.